mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-02 00:51:44 +00:00
virtio_net: invoke softirqs after __napi_schedule
__napi_schedule might raise softirq but nothing causes do_softirq to trigger, so it does not in fact run. As a result, the error message "NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08" sometimes occurs during boot of a KVM guest when the network service is started and we are oom: ... Bringing up loopback interface: [ OK ] Bringing up interface eth0: Determining IP information for eth0...NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 08 done. [ OK ] ... Further, receive queue processing might get delayed indefinitely until some interrupt triggers: virtio_net expected napi to be run immediately. One way to cause do_softirq to be executed is by invoking local_bh_enable(). As __napi_schedule is normally called from bh or irq context, this seems to make sense: disable bh before __napi_schedule and enable afterwards. In fact it's a very complicated way of calling do_softirq(), and works since this function is only used when we are not in interrupt context. It's not hot at all, in any ideal scenario. Reported-by: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com> Tested-by: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b8ae0eb320
commit
ec13ee8014
@ -492,7 +492,9 @@ static void virtnet_napi_enable(struct virtnet_info *vi)
|
||||
* We synchronize against interrupts via NAPI_STATE_SCHED */
|
||||
if (napi_schedule_prep(&vi->napi)) {
|
||||
virtqueue_disable_cb(vi->rvq);
|
||||
local_bh_disable();
|
||||
__napi_schedule(&vi->napi);
|
||||
local_bh_enable();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user