mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-18 00:53:40 +00:00
KVM: LAPIC: Delay trace_kvm_wait_lapic_expire tracepoint to after vmexit
wait_lapic_expire() call was moved above guest_enter_irqoff() because of
its tracepoint, which violated the RCU extended quiescent state invoked
by guest_enter_irqoff()[1][2]. This patch simply moves the tracepoint
below guest_exit_irqoff() in vcpu_enter_guest(). Snapshot the delta before
VM-Enter, but trace it after VM-Exit. This can help us to move
wait_lapic_expire() just before vmentry in the later patch.
[1] Commit 8b89fe1f6c
("kvm: x86: move tracepoints outside extended quiescent state")
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7821111/
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
[Track whether wait_lapic_expire was called, and do not invoke the tracepoint
if not. - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
84ea3acaa0
commit
ec0671d568
@ -1502,27 +1502,27 @@ static inline void __wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 guest_cycles)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void adjust_lapic_timer_advance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
|
||||
u64 guest_tsc, u64 tsc_deadline)
|
||||
s64 advance_expire_delta)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
|
||||
u32 timer_advance_ns = apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_ns;
|
||||
u64 ns;
|
||||
|
||||
/* too early */
|
||||
if (guest_tsc < tsc_deadline) {
|
||||
ns = (tsc_deadline - guest_tsc) * 1000000ULL;
|
||||
if (advance_expire_delta < 0) {
|
||||
ns = -advance_expire_delta * 1000000ULL;
|
||||
do_div(ns, vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz);
|
||||
timer_advance_ns -= min((u32)ns,
|
||||
timer_advance_ns / LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_STEP);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* too late */
|
||||
ns = (guest_tsc - tsc_deadline) * 1000000ULL;
|
||||
ns = advance_expire_delta * 1000000ULL;
|
||||
do_div(ns, vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz);
|
||||
timer_advance_ns += min((u32)ns,
|
||||
timer_advance_ns / LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_STEP);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (abs(guest_tsc - tsc_deadline) < LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_DONE)
|
||||
if (abs(advance_expire_delta) < LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_DONE)
|
||||
apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_adjust_done = true;
|
||||
if (unlikely(timer_advance_ns > 5000)) {
|
||||
timer_advance_ns = 0;
|
||||
@ -1545,13 +1545,13 @@ void wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
|
||||
tsc_deadline = apic->lapic_timer.expired_tscdeadline;
|
||||
apic->lapic_timer.expired_tscdeadline = 0;
|
||||
guest_tsc = kvm_read_l1_tsc(vcpu, rdtsc());
|
||||
trace_kvm_wait_lapic_expire(vcpu->vcpu_id, guest_tsc - tsc_deadline);
|
||||
apic->lapic_timer.advance_expire_delta = guest_tsc - tsc_deadline;
|
||||
|
||||
if (guest_tsc < tsc_deadline)
|
||||
__wait_lapic_expire(vcpu, tsc_deadline - guest_tsc);
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(!apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_adjust_done))
|
||||
adjust_lapic_timer_advance(vcpu, guest_tsc, tsc_deadline);
|
||||
adjust_lapic_timer_advance(vcpu, apic->lapic_timer.advance_expire_delta);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void start_sw_tscdeadline(struct kvm_lapic *apic)
|
||||
|
@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ struct kvm_timer {
|
||||
u64 tscdeadline;
|
||||
u64 expired_tscdeadline;
|
||||
u32 timer_advance_ns;
|
||||
s64 advance_expire_delta;
|
||||
atomic_t pending; /* accumulated triggered timers */
|
||||
bool hv_timer_in_use;
|
||||
bool timer_advance_adjust_done;
|
||||
|
@ -7980,6 +7980,13 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
|
||||
++vcpu->stat.exits;
|
||||
|
||||
guest_exit_irqoff();
|
||||
if (lapic_in_kernel(vcpu)) {
|
||||
s64 delta = vcpu->arch.apic->lapic_timer.advance_expire_delta;
|
||||
if (delta != S64_MIN) {
|
||||
trace_kvm_wait_lapic_expire(vcpu->vcpu_id, delta);
|
||||
vcpu->arch.apic->lapic_timer.advance_expire_delta = S64_MIN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
local_irq_enable();
|
||||
preempt_enable();
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user