net/mlx5: E-Switch, Prevent ingress rate configuration of uplink rep

Since the implementation relies on limiting the VF transmit rate to
simulate ingress rate limiting, and since either uplink representor or
ecpf are not associated with a VF, we limit the rate limit configuration
for those ports.

Fixes: fcb64c0f56 ("net/mlx5: E-Switch, add ingress rate support")
Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <eli@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Eli Cohen 2020-01-12 13:43:37 +02:00 committed by Saeed Mahameed
parent b850a82114
commit e401a1848b

View File

@ -4036,6 +4036,13 @@ static int apply_police_params(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, u32 rate,
u32 rate_mbps;
int err;
vport_num = rpriv->rep->vport;
if (vport_num >= MLX5_VPORT_ECPF) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
"Ingress rate limit is supported only for Eswitch ports connected to VFs");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
esw = priv->mdev->priv.eswitch;
/* rate is given in bytes/sec.
* First convert to bits/sec and then round to the nearest mbit/secs.
@ -4044,8 +4051,6 @@ static int apply_police_params(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, u32 rate,
* 1 mbit/sec.
*/
rate_mbps = rate ? max_t(u32, (rate * 8 + 500000) / 1000000, 1) : 0;
vport_num = rpriv->rep->vport;
err = mlx5_esw_modify_vport_rate(esw, vport_num, rate_mbps);
if (err)
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "failed applying action to hardware");