mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-22 20:22:09 +00:00
memory-hotplug.rst: remove locking details from admin-guide
Patch series "memory-hotplug.rst: complete admin-guide overhaul", v3. This patch (of 2): We have the same content at Documentation/core-api/memory-hotplug.rst and it doesn't fit into the admin-guide. The documentation was accidentially duplicated when merging. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210707073205.3835-1-david@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210707073205.3835-2-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7d2a07b769
commit
df82bf5a9f
@ -415,45 +415,6 @@ Need more implementation yet....
|
||||
- Guard from remove if not yet.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Locking Internals
|
||||
=================
|
||||
|
||||
When adding/removing memory that uses memory block devices (i.e. ordinary RAM),
|
||||
the device_hotplug_lock should be held to:
|
||||
|
||||
- synchronize against online/offline requests (e.g. via sysfs). This way, memory
|
||||
block devices can only be accessed (.online/.state attributes) by user
|
||||
space once memory has been fully added. And when removing memory, we
|
||||
know nobody is in critical sections.
|
||||
- synchronize against CPU hotplug and similar (e.g. relevant for ACPI and PPC)
|
||||
|
||||
Especially, there is a possible lock inversion that is avoided using
|
||||
device_hotplug_lock when adding memory and user space tries to online that
|
||||
memory faster than expected:
|
||||
|
||||
- device_online() will first take the device_lock(), followed by
|
||||
mem_hotplug_lock
|
||||
- add_memory_resource() will first take the mem_hotplug_lock, followed by
|
||||
the device_lock() (while creating the devices, during bus_add_device()).
|
||||
|
||||
As the device is visible to user space before taking the device_lock(), this
|
||||
can result in a lock inversion.
|
||||
|
||||
onlining/offlining of memory should be done via device_online()/
|
||||
device_offline() - to make sure it is properly synchronized to actions
|
||||
via sysfs. Holding device_hotplug_lock is advised (to e.g. protect online_type)
|
||||
|
||||
When adding/removing/onlining/offlining memory or adding/removing
|
||||
heterogeneous/device memory, we should always hold the mem_hotplug_lock in
|
||||
write mode to serialise memory hotplug (e.g. access to global/zone
|
||||
variables).
|
||||
|
||||
In addition, mem_hotplug_lock (in contrast to device_hotplug_lock) in read
|
||||
mode allows for a quite efficient get_online_mems/put_online_mems
|
||||
implementation, so code accessing memory can protect from that memory
|
||||
vanishing.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Future Work
|
||||
===========
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user