mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-22 20:22:09 +00:00
rcu: Make polled grace-period API account for expedited grace periods
Currently, this code could splat: oldstate = get_state_synchronize_rcu(); synchronize_rcu_expedited(); WARN_ON_ONCE(!poll_state_synchronize_rcu(oldstate)); This situation is counter-intuitive and user-unfriendly. After all, there really was a perfectly valid full grace period right after the call to get_state_synchronize_rcu(), so why shouldn't poll_state_synchronize_rcu() know about it? This commit therefore makes the polled grace-period API aware of expedited grace periods in addition to the normal grace periods that it is already aware of. With this change, the above code is guaranteed not to splat. Please note that the above code can still splat due to counter wrap on the one hand and situations involving partially overlapping normal/expedited grace periods on the other. On 64-bit systems, the second is of course much more likely than the first. It is possible to modify this approach to prevent overlapping grace periods from causing splats, but only at the expense of greatly increasing the probability of counter wrap, as in within milliseconds on 32-bit systems and within minutes on 64-bit systems. This commit is in preparation for polled expedited grace periods. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220121142454.1994916-1-bfoster@redhat.com/ Link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RNKWW9jQyfjxw2E8dsXVTdvZYh0HnYeSHDKog9jhdN8/edit?usp=sharing Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bf95b2bc3e
commit
dd04140531
@ -1812,6 +1812,7 @@ static void rcu_poll_gp_seq_end(unsigned long *snap)
|
||||
if (*snap && *snap == rcu_state.gp_seq_polled) {
|
||||
rcu_seq_end(&rcu_state.gp_seq_polled);
|
||||
rcu_state.gp_seq_polled_snap = 0;
|
||||
rcu_state.gp_seq_polled_exp_snap = 0;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
*snap = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -3913,10 +3914,10 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void)
|
||||
"Illegal synchronize_rcu() in RCU read-side critical section");
|
||||
if (rcu_blocking_is_gp()) {
|
||||
// Note well that this code runs with !PREEMPT && !SMP.
|
||||
// In addition, all code that advances grace periods runs
|
||||
// at process level. Therefore, this GP overlaps with other
|
||||
// GPs only by being fully nested within them, which allows
|
||||
// reuse of ->gp_seq_polled_snap.
|
||||
// In addition, all code that advances grace periods runs at
|
||||
// process level. Therefore, this normal GP overlaps with
|
||||
// other normal GPs only by being fully nested within them,
|
||||
// which allows reuse of ->gp_seq_polled_snap.
|
||||
rcu_poll_gp_seq_start_unlocked(&rcu_state.gp_seq_polled_snap);
|
||||
rcu_poll_gp_seq_end_unlocked(&rcu_state.gp_seq_polled_snap);
|
||||
if (rcu_init_invoked())
|
||||
|
@ -325,6 +325,7 @@ struct rcu_state {
|
||||
unsigned long gp_wake_seq; /* ->gp_seq at ^^^. */
|
||||
unsigned long gp_seq_polled; /* GP seq for polled API. */
|
||||
unsigned long gp_seq_polled_snap; /* ->gp_seq_polled at normal GP start. */
|
||||
unsigned long gp_seq_polled_exp_snap; /* ->gp_seq_polled at expedited GP start. */
|
||||
|
||||
/* End of fields guarded by root rcu_node's lock. */
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp);
|
||||
static void rcu_exp_gp_seq_start(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
rcu_seq_start(&rcu_state.expedited_sequence);
|
||||
rcu_poll_gp_seq_start_unlocked(&rcu_state.gp_seq_polled_exp_snap);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -34,6 +35,7 @@ static __maybe_unused unsigned long rcu_exp_gp_seq_endval(void)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void rcu_exp_gp_seq_end(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
rcu_poll_gp_seq_end_unlocked(&rcu_state.gp_seq_polled_exp_snap);
|
||||
rcu_seq_end(&rcu_state.expedited_sequence);
|
||||
smp_mb(); /* Ensure that consecutive grace periods serialize. */
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -913,8 +915,18 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
|
||||
"Illegal synchronize_rcu_expedited() in RCU read-side critical section");
|
||||
|
||||
/* Is the state is such that the call is a grace period? */
|
||||
if (rcu_blocking_is_gp())
|
||||
return;
|
||||
if (rcu_blocking_is_gp()) {
|
||||
// Note well that this code runs with !PREEMPT && !SMP.
|
||||
// In addition, all code that advances grace periods runs
|
||||
// at process level. Therefore, this expedited GP overlaps
|
||||
// with other expedited GPs only by being fully nested within
|
||||
// them, which allows reuse of ->gp_seq_polled_exp_snap.
|
||||
rcu_poll_gp_seq_start_unlocked(&rcu_state.gp_seq_polled_exp_snap);
|
||||
rcu_poll_gp_seq_end_unlocked(&rcu_state.gp_seq_polled_exp_snap);
|
||||
if (rcu_init_invoked())
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
return; // Context allows vacuous grace periods.
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If expedited grace periods are prohibited, fall back to normal. */
|
||||
if (rcu_gp_is_normal()) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user