mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-01 09:41:44 +00:00
doc: Emphasize that "toy" RCU requires recursive rwlock
Reported-by: "yangzc@uit.com.cn" <yangzc@uit.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
93728af0a1
commit
d3d3a3ccc4
@ -562,7 +562,9 @@ This section presents a "toy" RCU implementation that is based on
|
|||||||
familiar locking primitives. Its overhead makes it a non-starter for
|
familiar locking primitives. Its overhead makes it a non-starter for
|
||||||
real-life use, as does its lack of scalability. It is also unsuitable
|
real-life use, as does its lack of scalability. It is also unsuitable
|
||||||
for realtime use, since it allows scheduling latency to "bleed" from
|
for realtime use, since it allows scheduling latency to "bleed" from
|
||||||
one read-side critical section to another.
|
one read-side critical section to another. It also assumes recursive
|
||||||
|
reader-writer locks: If you try this with non-recursive locks, and
|
||||||
|
you allow nested rcu_read_lock() calls, you can deadlock.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
However, it is probably the easiest implementation to relate to, so is
|
However, it is probably the easiest implementation to relate to, so is
|
||||||
a good starting point.
|
a good starting point.
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user