mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-02 00:51:44 +00:00
KVM: SVM: limit kvm_handle_page_fault to #PF handling
It has always annoyed me a bit how SVM_EXIT_NPF is handled by pf_interception. This is also the only reason behind the under-documented need_unprotect argument to kvm_handle_page_fault. Let NPF go straight to kvm_mmu_page_fault, just like VMX does in handle_ept_violation and handle_ept_misconfig. Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1cf53587c0
commit
d000653057
@ -3820,8 +3820,7 @@ static bool try_async_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool prefault, gfn_t gfn,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int kvm_handle_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 error_code,
|
||||
u64 fault_address, char *insn, int insn_len,
|
||||
bool need_unprotect)
|
||||
u64 fault_address, char *insn, int insn_len)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int r = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3829,7 +3828,7 @@ int kvm_handle_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 error_code,
|
||||
default:
|
||||
trace_kvm_page_fault(fault_address, error_code);
|
||||
|
||||
if (need_unprotect && kvm_event_needs_reinjection(vcpu))
|
||||
if (kvm_event_needs_reinjection(vcpu))
|
||||
kvm_mmu_unprotect_page_virt(vcpu, fault_address);
|
||||
r = kvm_mmu_page_fault(vcpu, fault_address, error_code, insn,
|
||||
insn_len);
|
||||
|
@ -65,8 +65,7 @@ void kvm_init_shadow_ept_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool execonly,
|
||||
bool accessed_dirty);
|
||||
bool kvm_can_do_async_pf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
|
||||
int kvm_handle_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 error_code,
|
||||
u64 fault_address, char *insn, int insn_len,
|
||||
bool need_unprotect);
|
||||
u64 fault_address, char *insn, int insn_len);
|
||||
|
||||
static inline unsigned int kvm_mmu_available_pages(struct kvm *kvm)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -2141,7 +2141,18 @@ static int pf_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
|
||||
|
||||
return kvm_handle_page_fault(&svm->vcpu, error_code, fault_address,
|
||||
svm->vmcb->control.insn_bytes,
|
||||
svm->vmcb->control.insn_len, !npt_enabled);
|
||||
svm->vmcb->control.insn_len);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int npf_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u64 fault_address = svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_2;
|
||||
u64 error_code = svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_1;
|
||||
|
||||
trace_kvm_page_fault(fault_address, error_code);
|
||||
return kvm_mmu_page_fault(&svm->vcpu, fault_address, error_code,
|
||||
svm->vmcb->control.insn_bytes,
|
||||
svm->vmcb->control.insn_len);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int db_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
|
||||
@ -4128,7 +4139,7 @@ static int (*const svm_exit_handlers[])(struct vcpu_svm *svm) = {
|
||||
[SVM_EXIT_MONITOR] = monitor_interception,
|
||||
[SVM_EXIT_MWAIT] = mwait_interception,
|
||||
[SVM_EXIT_XSETBV] = xsetbv_interception,
|
||||
[SVM_EXIT_NPF] = pf_interception,
|
||||
[SVM_EXIT_NPF] = npf_interception,
|
||||
[SVM_EXIT_RSM] = emulate_on_interception,
|
||||
[SVM_EXIT_AVIC_INCOMPLETE_IPI] = avic_incomplete_ipi_interception,
|
||||
[SVM_EXIT_AVIC_UNACCELERATED_ACCESS] = avic_unaccelerated_access_interception,
|
||||
|
@ -5894,8 +5894,7 @@ static int handle_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
|
||||
cr2 = vmcs_readl(EXIT_QUALIFICATION);
|
||||
/* EPT won't cause page fault directly */
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(!vcpu->arch.apf.host_apf_reason && enable_ept);
|
||||
return kvm_handle_page_fault(vcpu, error_code, cr2, NULL, 0,
|
||||
true);
|
||||
return kvm_handle_page_fault(vcpu, error_code, cr2, NULL, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ex_no = intr_info & INTR_INFO_VECTOR_MASK;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user