mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-27 06:31:52 +00:00
f2fs: fix to do sanity check on summary info
As Wenqing Liu reported in bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216456 BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in recover_data+0x63ae/0x6ae0 [f2fs] Read of size 4 at addr ffff8881464dcd80 by task mount/1013 CPU: 3 PID: 1013 Comm: mount Tainted: G W 6.0.0-rc4 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x5e print_report.cold+0xf3/0x68d kasan_report+0xa8/0x130 recover_data+0x63ae/0x6ae0 [f2fs] f2fs_recover_fsync_data+0x120d/0x1fc0 [f2fs] f2fs_fill_super+0x4665/0x61e0 [f2fs] mount_bdev+0x2cf/0x3b0 legacy_get_tree+0xed/0x1d0 vfs_get_tree+0x81/0x2b0 path_mount+0x47e/0x19d0 do_mount+0xce/0xf0 __x64_sys_mount+0x12c/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd The root cause is: in fuzzed image, SSA table is corrupted: ofs_in_node is larger than ADDRS_PER_PAGE(), result in out-of-range access on 4k-size page. - recover_data - do_recover_data - check_index_in_prev_nodes - f2fs_data_blkaddr This patch adds sanity check on summary info in recovery and GC flow in where the flows rely on them. After patch: [ 29.310883] F2FS-fs (loop0): Inconsistent ofs_in_node:65286 in summary, ino:0, nid:6, max:1018 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Wenqing Liu <wenqingliu0120@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1e8a9191cc
commit
c6ad7fd166
10
fs/f2fs/gc.c
10
fs/f2fs/gc.c
@ -1078,7 +1078,7 @@ static bool is_alive(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct f2fs_summary *sum,
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct page *node_page;
|
||||
nid_t nid;
|
||||
unsigned int ofs_in_node;
|
||||
unsigned int ofs_in_node, max_addrs;
|
||||
block_t source_blkaddr;
|
||||
|
||||
nid = le32_to_cpu(sum->nid);
|
||||
@ -1104,6 +1104,14 @@ static bool is_alive(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct f2fs_summary *sum,
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
max_addrs = IS_INODE(node_page) ? DEF_ADDRS_PER_INODE :
|
||||
DEF_ADDRS_PER_BLOCK;
|
||||
if (ofs_in_node >= max_addrs) {
|
||||
f2fs_err(sbi, "Inconsistent ofs_in_node:%u in summary, ino:%u, nid:%u, max:%u",
|
||||
ofs_in_node, dni->ino, dni->nid, max_addrs);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
*nofs = ofs_of_node(node_page);
|
||||
source_blkaddr = data_blkaddr(NULL, node_page, ofs_in_node);
|
||||
f2fs_put_page(node_page, 1);
|
||||
|
@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ static int check_index_in_prev_nodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
|
||||
struct dnode_of_data tdn = *dn;
|
||||
nid_t ino, nid;
|
||||
struct inode *inode;
|
||||
unsigned int offset;
|
||||
unsigned int offset, ofs_in_node, max_addrs;
|
||||
block_t bidx;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -501,15 +501,24 @@ static int check_index_in_prev_nodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
|
||||
got_it:
|
||||
/* Use the locked dnode page and inode */
|
||||
nid = le32_to_cpu(sum.nid);
|
||||
ofs_in_node = le16_to_cpu(sum.ofs_in_node);
|
||||
|
||||
max_addrs = ADDRS_PER_PAGE(dn->node_page, dn->inode);
|
||||
if (ofs_in_node >= max_addrs) {
|
||||
f2fs_err(sbi, "Inconsistent ofs_in_node:%u in summary, ino:%lu, nid:%u, max:%u",
|
||||
ofs_in_node, dn->inode->i_ino, nid, max_addrs);
|
||||
return -EFSCORRUPTED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (dn->inode->i_ino == nid) {
|
||||
tdn.nid = nid;
|
||||
if (!dn->inode_page_locked)
|
||||
lock_page(dn->inode_page);
|
||||
tdn.node_page = dn->inode_page;
|
||||
tdn.ofs_in_node = le16_to_cpu(sum.ofs_in_node);
|
||||
tdn.ofs_in_node = ofs_in_node;
|
||||
goto truncate_out;
|
||||
} else if (dn->nid == nid) {
|
||||
tdn.ofs_in_node = le16_to_cpu(sum.ofs_in_node);
|
||||
tdn.ofs_in_node = ofs_in_node;
|
||||
goto truncate_out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user