mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-02 18:21:49 +00:00
i2c: img-scb: support I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK
This commit adds support for the I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK protocol modification. Such behaviour can only be implemented in atomic mode. So, if a transaction contains a message with such flag the drivers switches to atomic mode. The implementation consists simply in treating NAKs as ACKs. Signed-off-by: Sifan Naeem <sifan.naeem@imgtec.com> Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Reviewed-by: James Hartley <james.hartley@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
54177ccfbe
commit
c55ebe0e72
@ -750,7 +750,9 @@ static unsigned int img_i2c_atomic(struct img_i2c *i2c,
|
||||
next_cmd = CMD_RET_ACK;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case CMD_RET_ACK:
|
||||
if (i2c->line_status & LINESTAT_ACK_DET) {
|
||||
if (i2c->line_status & LINESTAT_ACK_DET ||
|
||||
(i2c->line_status & LINESTAT_NACK_DET &&
|
||||
i2c->msg.flags & I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK)) {
|
||||
if (i2c->msg.len == 0) {
|
||||
next_cmd = CMD_GEN_STOP;
|
||||
} else if (i2c->msg.flags & I2C_M_RD) {
|
||||
@ -1017,20 +1019,23 @@ static int img_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
|
||||
if (likely(msgs[i].len))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* 0 byte reads are not possible because the slave could try
|
||||
* and pull the data line low, preventing a stop bit.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD))
|
||||
if (!msgs[i].len && msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD)
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* 0 byte writes are possible and used for probing, but we
|
||||
* cannot do them in automatic mode, so use atomic mode
|
||||
* instead.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Also, the I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK mode can only be implemented
|
||||
* in atomic mode.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
atomic = true;
|
||||
if (!msgs[i].len ||
|
||||
(msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK))
|
||||
atomic = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ret = clk_prepare_enable(i2c->scb_clk);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user