mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-29 07:31:29 +00:00
RDMA/cxgb4: Use completion objects for event blocking
There exists a race condition when using wait_queue_head_t objects that are declared on the stack. This was being done in a few places where we are sending work requests to the FW and awaiting replies, but we don't have an endpoint structure with an embedded c4iw_wr_wait struct. So the code was allocating it locally on the stack. Bad design. The race is: 1) thread on cpuX declares the wait_queue_head_t on the stack, then posts a firmware WR with that wait object ptr as the cookie to be returned in the WR reply. This thread will proceed to block in wait_event_timeout() but before it does: 2) An interrupt runs on cpuY with the WR reply. fw6_msg() handles this and calls c4iw_wake_up(). c4iw_wake_up() sets the condition variable in the c4iw_wr_wait object to TRUE and will call wake_up(), but before it calls wake_up(): 3) The thread on cpuX calls c4iw_wait_for_reply(), which calls wait_event_timeout(). The wait_event_timeout() macro checks the condition variable and returns immediately since it is TRUE. So this thread never blocks/sleeps. The function then returns effectively deallocating the c4iw_wr_wait object that was on the stack. 4) So at this point cpuY has a pointer to the c4iw_wr_wait object that is no longer valid. Further its pointing to a stack frame that might now be in use by some other context/thread. So cpuY continues execution and calls wake_up() on a ptr to a wait object that as been effectively deallocated. This race, when it hits, can cause a crash in wake_up(), which I've seen under heavy stress. It can also corrupt the referenced stack which can cause any number of failures. The fix: Use struct completion, which supports on-stack declarations. Completions use a spinlock around setting the condition to true and the wake up so that steps 2 and 4 above are atomic and step 3 can never happen in-between. Signed-off-by: Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
257313b2a8
commit
c337374bf2
@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
|
||||
#include <linux/list.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/idr.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/completion.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/sched.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/pci.h>
|
||||
@ -131,28 +131,21 @@ static inline int c4iw_num_stags(struct c4iw_rdev *rdev)
|
||||
|
||||
#define C4IW_WR_TO (10*HZ)
|
||||
|
||||
enum {
|
||||
REPLY_READY = 0,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct c4iw_wr_wait {
|
||||
wait_queue_head_t wait;
|
||||
unsigned long status;
|
||||
struct completion completion;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void c4iw_init_wr_wait(struct c4iw_wr_wait *wr_waitp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
wr_waitp->ret = 0;
|
||||
wr_waitp->status = 0;
|
||||
init_waitqueue_head(&wr_waitp->wait);
|
||||
init_completion(&wr_waitp->completion);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void c4iw_wake_up(struct c4iw_wr_wait *wr_waitp, int ret)
|
||||
{
|
||||
wr_waitp->ret = ret;
|
||||
set_bit(REPLY_READY, &wr_waitp->status);
|
||||
wake_up(&wr_waitp->wait);
|
||||
complete(&wr_waitp->completion);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int c4iw_wait_for_reply(struct c4iw_rdev *rdev,
|
||||
@ -164,8 +157,7 @@ static inline int c4iw_wait_for_reply(struct c4iw_rdev *rdev,
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
do {
|
||||
ret = wait_event_timeout(wr_waitp->wait,
|
||||
test_and_clear_bit(REPLY_READY, &wr_waitp->status), to);
|
||||
ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&wr_waitp->completion, to);
|
||||
if (!ret) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR MOD "%s - Device %s not responding - "
|
||||
"tid %u qpid %u\n", func,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user