mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-23 04:31:50 +00:00
rcu/nocb: Use build-time no-CBs check in rcu_core()
Currently, rcu_core() invokes rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded() each time it needs to know whether the current CPU is a no-CBs CPU. Given that it is not possible to change the no-CBs status of a CPU after boot, and given that it is not possible to even have no-CBs CPUs in CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=n kernels, this repeated runtime invocation wastes CPU. This commit therefore created a const on-stack variable to allow this check to be done only once per rcu_core() invocation. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ec5ef87bac
commit
c1ab99d66e
@ -2302,6 +2302,8 @@ static __latent_entropy void rcu_core(void)
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
struct rcu_data *rdp = raw_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
|
||||
struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
|
||||
const bool offloaded = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU) &&
|
||||
rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded(&rdp->cblist);
|
||||
|
||||
if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -2321,8 +2323,7 @@ static __latent_entropy void rcu_core(void)
|
||||
|
||||
/* No grace period and unregistered callbacks? */
|
||||
if (!rcu_gp_in_progress() &&
|
||||
rcu_segcblist_is_enabled(&rdp->cblist) &&
|
||||
!rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded(&rdp->cblist)) {
|
||||
rcu_segcblist_is_enabled(&rdp->cblist) && !offloaded) {
|
||||
local_irq_save(flags);
|
||||
if (!rcu_segcblist_restempty(&rdp->cblist, RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL))
|
||||
rcu_accelerate_cbs_unlocked(rnp, rdp);
|
||||
@ -2332,8 +2333,7 @@ static __latent_entropy void rcu_core(void)
|
||||
rcu_check_gp_start_stall(rnp, rdp, rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check());
|
||||
|
||||
/* If there are callbacks ready, invoke them. */
|
||||
if (!rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded(&rdp->cblist) &&
|
||||
rcu_segcblist_ready_cbs(&rdp->cblist) &&
|
||||
if (!offloaded && rcu_segcblist_ready_cbs(&rdp->cblist) &&
|
||||
likely(READ_ONCE(rcu_scheduler_fully_active)))
|
||||
rcu_do_batch(rdp);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user