rapidio/rio_cm: avoid GFP_KERNEL in atomic context

As reported by Alexey Khoroshilov (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/9/737):
riocm_send_close() is called from rio_cm_shutdown() under
spin_lock_bh(idr_lock), but riocm_send_close() uses a GFP_KERNEL
allocation.

Fix by taking riocm_send_close() outside of spinlock protected code.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unneeded `if (!list_empty())']
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160915175402.10122-1-alexandre.bounine@idt.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bounine <alexandre.bounine@idt.com>
Reported-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Alexandre Bounine 2016-09-19 14:44:47 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 63b52c4936
commit b92ae139c3

View File

@ -2247,17 +2247,30 @@ static int rio_cm_shutdown(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long code,
{
struct rio_channel *ch;
unsigned int i;
LIST_HEAD(list);
riocm_debug(EXIT, ".");
/*
* If there are any channels left in connected state send
* close notification to the connection partner.
* First build a list of channels that require a closing
* notification because function riocm_send_close() should
* be called outside of spinlock protected code.
*/
spin_lock_bh(&idr_lock);
idr_for_each_entry(&ch_idr, ch, i) {
riocm_debug(EXIT, "close ch %d", ch->id);
if (ch->state == RIO_CM_CONNECTED)
riocm_send_close(ch);
if (ch->state == RIO_CM_CONNECTED) {
riocm_debug(EXIT, "close ch %d", ch->id);
idr_remove(&ch_idr, ch->id);
list_add(&ch->ch_node, &list);
}
}
spin_unlock_bh(&idr_lock);
list_for_each_entry(ch, &list, ch_node)
riocm_send_close(ch);
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}