mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-22 04:02:20 +00:00
hwmon: (pmbus/ltc2978) Add chip specific write_byte_data
Several of the manuals for devices supported by this driver describes the need for a minimum wait time before the chip is ready to receive next command. This wait time is already implemented in the driver as a ltc_wait_ready function with a driver defined wait time of 100 ms, and is considered for specific devices before reading/writing data on the pmbus. Since this driver uses the default pmbus_regulator_ops for the enable/ disable/is_enabled functions we should add a driver specific callback for write_byte_data to prevent bypassing the wait time recommendations for the following devices: ltc3880/ltc3882/ltc3883/ltc3884/ltc3886/ ltc3887/ltc3889/ltm4664/ltm4675/ltm4676/ltm4677/ltm4678/ltm4680/ltm4686/ ltm4700/ltc7880. Signed-off-by: Mårten Lindahl <marten.lindahl@axis.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220428144039.2464667-4-marten.lindahl@axis.com Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f0a5c83976
commit
b90f994a37
@ -196,6 +196,17 @@ static int ltc_read_byte_data(struct i2c_client *client, int page, int reg)
|
||||
return pmbus_read_byte_data(client, page, reg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int ltc_write_byte_data(struct i2c_client *client, int page, int reg, u8 value)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = ltc_wait_ready(client);
|
||||
if (ret < 0)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
return pmbus_write_byte_data(client, page, reg, value);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int ltc_write_byte(struct i2c_client *client, int page, u8 byte)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
@ -681,6 +692,7 @@ static int ltc2978_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
|
||||
info = &data->info;
|
||||
info->write_word_data = ltc2978_write_word_data;
|
||||
info->write_byte = ltc_write_byte;
|
||||
info->write_byte_data = ltc_write_byte_data;
|
||||
info->read_word_data = ltc_read_word_data;
|
||||
info->read_byte_data = ltc_read_byte_data;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user