drm/i915: Don't set queue-priority hint when supressing the reschedule

We recorded the execlists->queue_priority_hint update for the inflight
request without kicking the tasklet. The next submitted request then
failed to be scheduled as it had a lower priority than the hint, leaving
the HW running with only the inflight request.

Fixes: 6cebcf746f ("drm/i915: Tweak scheduler's kick_submission()")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200519063123.20673-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit is contained in:
Chris Wilson 2020-05-19 07:31:12 +01:00
parent 25c26f18ea
commit b86fc6e5e8

View File

@ -209,14 +209,6 @@ static void kick_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
if (!inflight)
goto unlock;
ENGINE_TRACE(engine,
"bumping queue-priority-hint:%d for rq:%llx:%lld, inflight:%llx:%lld prio %d\n",
prio,
rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno,
inflight->fence.context, inflight->fence.seqno,
inflight->sched.attr.priority);
engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint = prio;
/*
* If we are already the currently executing context, don't
* bother evaluating if we should preempt ourselves.
@ -224,6 +216,14 @@ static void kick_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
if (inflight->context == rq->context)
goto unlock;
ENGINE_TRACE(engine,
"bumping queue-priority-hint:%d for rq:%llx:%lld, inflight:%llx:%lld prio %d\n",
prio,
rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno,
inflight->fence.context, inflight->fence.seqno,
inflight->sched.attr.priority);
engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint = prio;
if (need_preempt(prio, rq_prio(inflight)))
tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);