mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-12 22:23:55 +00:00
iio: accel: fxls8962af: fix errata bug E3 - I2C burst reads
When flushing the hw fifo there is a bug in the I2C that prevents burst reads of more than one sample pair. Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@geanix.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
79e3a5bdd9
commit
af959b7b96
@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
#include <linux/bits.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/bitfield.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/i2c.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/module.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/of_irq.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
|
||||
@ -623,16 +624,42 @@ static const struct iio_buffer_setup_ops fxls8962af_buffer_ops = {
|
||||
.postdisable = fxls8962af_buffer_postdisable,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static int fxls8962af_i2c_raw_read_errata3(struct fxls8962af_data *data,
|
||||
u16 *buffer, int samples,
|
||||
int sample_length)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i, ret;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < samples; i++) {
|
||||
ret = regmap_raw_read(data->regmap, FXLS8962AF_BUF_X_LSB,
|
||||
&buffer[i * 3], sample_length);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int fxls8962af_fifo_transfer(struct fxls8962af_data *data,
|
||||
u16 *buffer, int samples)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(data->regmap);
|
||||
int sample_length = 3 * sizeof(*buffer);
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
int total_length = samples * sample_length;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (i2c_verify_client(dev))
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Due to errata bug:
|
||||
* E3: FIFO burst read operation error using I2C interface
|
||||
* We have to avoid burst reads on I2C..
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = fxls8962af_i2c_raw_read_errata3(data, buffer, samples,
|
||||
sample_length);
|
||||
else
|
||||
ret = regmap_raw_read(data->regmap, FXLS8962AF_BUF_X_LSB, buffer,
|
||||
total_length);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
dev_err(dev, "Error transferring data from fifo: %d\n", ret);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user