x86: nmi_32/64.c - use apic_write_around instead of apic_write

apic_write_around will be expanded to apic_write in 64bit mode
anyway. Only a few CPUs (well, old CPUs to be precise) requires
such an action. In general it should not hurt and could be cleaned
up for apic_write (just in case)

Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Cc: mingo@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
Cyrill Gorcunov 2008-05-24 19:36:36 +04:00 committed by Thomas Gleixner
parent 4b82b27770
commit ad63ba169d
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ void acpi_nmi_enable(void)
static void __acpi_nmi_disable(void *__unused)
{
apic_write(APIC_LVT0, APIC_DM_NMI | APIC_LVT_MASKED);
apic_write_around(APIC_LVT0, APIC_DM_NMI | APIC_LVT_MASKED);
}
/*

View File

@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ late_initcall(init_lapic_nmi_sysfs);
static void __acpi_nmi_enable(void *__unused)
{
apic_write(APIC_LVT0, APIC_DM_NMI);
apic_write_around(APIC_LVT0, APIC_DM_NMI);
}
/*
@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ void acpi_nmi_enable(void)
static void __acpi_nmi_disable(void *__unused)
{
apic_write(APIC_LVT0, APIC_DM_NMI | APIC_LVT_MASKED);
apic_write_around(APIC_LVT0, APIC_DM_NMI | APIC_LVT_MASKED);
}
/*