libata hpt3xn: Hopefully sort out the DPLL logic versus the vendor code

Rather than ending up with two layers of negation jut rename the variable
and lose one.

Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
This commit is contained in:
Alan 2007-01-24 11:51:38 +00:00 committed by Jeff Garzik
parent 6a40da02be
commit a52865c239

View File

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
#include <linux/libata.h>
#define DRV_NAME "pata_hpt3x2n"
#define DRV_VERSION "0.3"
#define DRV_VERSION "0.3.2"
enum {
HPT_PCI_FAST = (1 << 31),
@ -297,11 +297,11 @@ static int hpt3x2n_pair_idle(struct ata_port *ap)
return 0;
}
static int hpt3x2n_use_dpll(struct ata_port *ap, int reading)
static int hpt3x2n_use_dpll(struct ata_port *ap, int writing)
{
long flags = (long)ap->host->private_data;
/* See if we should use the DPLL */
if (reading == 0)
if (writing)
return USE_DPLL; /* Needed for write */
if (flags & PCI66)
return USE_DPLL; /* Needed at 66Mhz */