net: mscc: ocelot: fix ineffective WARN_ON() in ocelot_stats.c

Since it is hopefully now clear that, since "last" and "layout[i].reg"
are enum types and not addresses, the existing WARN_ON() is ineffective
in checking that the _addresses_ are sorted in the proper order.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Vladimir Oltean 2023-04-12 15:47:37 +03:00 committed by Jakub Kicinski
parent 6663c01eca
commit a291399e63

View File

@ -901,6 +901,17 @@ static int ocelot_prepare_stats_regions(struct ocelot *ocelot)
if (!layout[i].reg)
continue;
/* enum ocelot_stat must be kept sorted in the same order
* as the addresses behind layout[i].reg in order to have
* efficient bulking
*/
if (last) {
WARN(ocelot->map[SYS][last & REG_MASK] >= ocelot->map[SYS][layout[i].reg & REG_MASK],
"reg 0x%x had address 0x%x but reg 0x%x has address 0x%x, bulking broken!",
last, ocelot->map[SYS][last & REG_MASK],
layout[i].reg, ocelot->map[SYS][layout[i].reg & REG_MASK]);
}
if (region && ocelot->map[SYS][layout[i].reg & REG_MASK] ==
ocelot->map[SYS][last & REG_MASK] + 4) {
region->count++;
@ -910,12 +921,6 @@ static int ocelot_prepare_stats_regions(struct ocelot *ocelot)
if (!region)
return -ENOMEM;
/* enum ocelot_stat must be kept sorted in the same
* order as layout[i].reg in order to have efficient
* bulking
*/
WARN_ON(last >= layout[i].reg);
region->base = layout[i].reg;
region->first_stat = i;
region->count = 1;