mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-02 00:51:44 +00:00
tracing: fix comments about trace buffer resizing
Impact: cleanup Some of the comments about the trace buffer resizing is gobbledygook. And I wonder why people question if I'm a native English speaker. This patch makes the comments make a bit more sense. Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
51b643b404
commit
a123c52b46
@ -2336,7 +2336,8 @@ static int tracing_resize_ring_buffer(unsigned long size)
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* If kernel or user changes the size of the ring buffer
|
* If kernel or user changes the size of the ring buffer
|
||||||
* it get completed.
|
* we use the size that was given, and we can forget about
|
||||||
|
* expanding it later.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
ring_buffer_expanded = 1;
|
ring_buffer_expanded = 1;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -2351,8 +2352,20 @@ static int tracing_resize_ring_buffer(unsigned long size)
|
|||||||
r = ring_buffer_resize(global_trace.buffer,
|
r = ring_buffer_resize(global_trace.buffer,
|
||||||
global_trace.entries);
|
global_trace.entries);
|
||||||
if (r < 0) {
|
if (r < 0) {
|
||||||
/* AARGH! We are left with different
|
/*
|
||||||
* size max buffer!!!! */
|
* AARGH! We are left with different
|
||||||
|
* size max buffer!!!!
|
||||||
|
* The max buffer is our "snapshot" buffer.
|
||||||
|
* When a tracer needs a snapshot (one of the
|
||||||
|
* latency tracers), it swaps the max buffer
|
||||||
|
* with the saved snap shot. We succeeded to
|
||||||
|
* update the size of the main buffer, but failed to
|
||||||
|
* update the size of the max buffer. But when we tried
|
||||||
|
* to reset the main buffer to the original size, we
|
||||||
|
* failed there too. This is very unlikely to
|
||||||
|
* happen, but if it does, warn and kill all
|
||||||
|
* tracing.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
WARN_ON(1);
|
WARN_ON(1);
|
||||||
tracing_disabled = 1;
|
tracing_disabled = 1;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user