fix the softlockup watchdog to actually work

this Xen related commit:

   commit 966812dc98
   Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
   Date:   Tue May 8 00:28:02 2007 -0700

       Ignore stolen time in the softlockup watchdog

broke the softlockup watchdog to never report any lockups. (!)

print_timestamp defaults to 0, this makes the following condition
always true:

	if (print_timestamp < (touch_timestamp + 1) ||

and we'll in essence never report soft lockups.

apparently the functionality of the soft lockup watchdog was never
actually tested with that patch applied ...

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Ingo Molnar 2007-10-16 23:26:06 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent a3b13c23f1
commit a115d5caca

View File

@ -82,10 +82,11 @@ void softlockup_tick(void)
print_timestamp = per_cpu(print_timestamp, this_cpu); print_timestamp = per_cpu(print_timestamp, this_cpu);
/* report at most once a second */ /* report at most once a second */
if (print_timestamp < (touch_timestamp + 1) || if ((print_timestamp >= touch_timestamp &&
did_panic || print_timestamp < (touch_timestamp + 1)) ||
!per_cpu(watchdog_task, this_cpu)) did_panic || !per_cpu(watchdog_task, this_cpu)) {
return; return;
}
/* do not print during early bootup: */ /* do not print during early bootup: */
if (unlikely(system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING)) { if (unlikely(system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING)) {