extcon: Use dev_of_node(dev) instead of dev->of_node

The dev_of_node function should be preferred.
In the result we may drop unneeded NULL check
of the pointer to the device object.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
This commit is contained in:
Andy Shevchenko 2023-03-22 16:40:01 +02:00 committed by Chanwoo Choi
parent 0146f56b91
commit 9b4aea51cb

View File

@ -1423,21 +1423,17 @@ out:
*/
struct extcon_dev *extcon_get_edev_by_phandle(struct device *dev, int index)
{
struct device_node *node;
struct device_node *node, *np = dev_of_node(dev);
struct extcon_dev *edev;
if (!dev)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
if (!dev->of_node) {
if (!np) {
dev_dbg(dev, "device does not have a device node entry\n");
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "extcon", index);
node = of_parse_phandle(np, "extcon", index);
if (!node) {
dev_dbg(dev, "failed to get phandle in %pOF node\n",
dev->of_node);
dev_dbg(dev, "failed to get phandle in %pOF node\n", np);
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
}