mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-25 05:32:00 +00:00
mm: use folio_add_new_anon_rmap() if folio_test_anon(folio)==false
For the !folio_test_anon(folio) case, we can now invoke folio_add_new_anon_rmap() with the rmap flags set to either EXCLUSIVE or non-EXCLUSIVE. This action will suppress the VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO check within __folio_add_anon_rmap() while initiating the process of bringing up mTHP swapin. static __always_inline void __folio_add_anon_rmap(struct folio *folio, struct page *page, int nr_pages, struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, rmap_t flags, enum rmap_level level) { ... if (unlikely(!folio_test_anon(folio))) { VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_large(folio) && level != RMAP_LEVEL_PMD, folio); } ... } It also improves the code's readability. Currently, all new anonymous folios calling folio_add_anon_rmap_ptes() are order-0. This ensures that new folios cannot be partially exclusive; they are either entirely exclusive or entirely shared. A useful comment from Hugh's fix: : Commit "mm: use folio_add_new_anon_rmap() if folio_test_anon(folio)== : false" has extended folio_add_new_anon_rmap() to use on non-exclusive : folios, already visible to others in swap cache and on LRU. : : That renders its non-atomic __folio_set_swapbacked() unsafe: it risks : overwriting concurrent atomic operations on folio->flags, losing bits : added or restoring bits cleared. Since it's only used in this risky way : when folio_test_locked and !folio_test_anon, many such races are excluded; : but, for example, isolations by folio_test_clear_lru() are vulnerable, and : setting or clearing active. : : It could just use the atomic folio_set_swapbacked(); but this function : does try to avoid atomics where it can, so use a branch instead: just : avoid setting swapbacked when it is already set, that is good enough. : (Swapbacked is normally stable once set: lazyfree can undo it, but only : later, when found anon in a page table.) : : This fixes a lot of instability under compaction and swapping loads: : assorted "Bad page"s, VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO()s, apparently even page double : frees - though I've not worked out what races could lead to the latter. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: comment fixes, per David and akpm] [v-songbaohua@oppo.com: lock the folio to avoid race] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240622032002.53033-1-21cnbao@gmail.com [hughd@google.com: folio_add_new_anon_rmap() careful __folio_set_swapbacked()] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/f3599b1d-8323-0dc5-e9e0-fdb3cfc3dd5a@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240617231137.80726-3-21cnbao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Tested-by: Shuai Yuan <yuanshuai@oppo.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
15bde4abab
commit
9ae2feaced
@ -4341,6 +4341,15 @@ check_folio:
|
||||
if (unlikely(folio != swapcache && swapcache)) {
|
||||
folio_add_new_anon_rmap(folio, vma, address, RMAP_EXCLUSIVE);
|
||||
folio_add_lru_vma(folio, vma);
|
||||
} else if (!folio_test_anon(folio)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We currently only expect small !anon folios, which are either
|
||||
* fully exclusive or fully shared. If we ever get large folios
|
||||
* here, we have to be careful.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_test_large(folio));
|
||||
VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
|
||||
folio_add_new_anon_rmap(folio, vma, address, rmap_flags);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
folio_add_anon_rmap_ptes(folio, page, nr_pages, vma, address,
|
||||
rmap_flags);
|
||||
|
@ -1422,6 +1422,8 @@ void folio_add_new_anon_rmap(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
|
||||
VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!exclusive && !folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
|
||||
VM_BUG_ON_VMA(address < vma->vm_start ||
|
||||
address + (nr << PAGE_SHIFT) > vma->vm_end, vma);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!folio_test_swapbacked(folio))
|
||||
__folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
|
||||
__folio_set_anon(folio, vma, address, exclusive);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1908,8 +1908,18 @@ static int unuse_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
|
||||
VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_writeback(folio), folio);
|
||||
if (pte_swp_exclusive(old_pte))
|
||||
rmap_flags |= RMAP_EXCLUSIVE;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We currently only expect small !anon folios, which are either
|
||||
* fully exclusive or fully shared. If we ever get large folios
|
||||
* here, we have to be careful.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!folio_test_anon(folio)) {
|
||||
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_test_large(folio));
|
||||
VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
|
||||
folio_add_new_anon_rmap(folio, vma, addr, rmap_flags);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
folio_add_anon_rmap_pte(folio, page, vma, addr, rmap_flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else { /* ksm created a completely new copy */
|
||||
folio_add_new_anon_rmap(folio, vma, addr, RMAP_EXCLUSIVE);
|
||||
folio_add_lru_vma(folio, vma);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user