From ca2bb69514a8bc7f83914122f0d596371352416c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias May Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 21:19:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] geneve: do not use RT_TOS for IPv6 flowlabel According to Guillaume Nault RT_TOS should never be used for IPv6. Quote: RT_TOS() is an old macro used to interprete IPv4 TOS as described in the obsolete RFC 1349. It's conceptually wrong to use it even in IPv4 code, although, given the current state of the code, most of the existing calls have no consequence. But using RT_TOS() in IPv6 code is always a bug: IPv6 never had a "TOS" field to be interpreted the RFC 1349 way. There's no historical compatibility to worry about. Fixes: 3a56f86f1be6 ("geneve: handle ipv6 priority like ipv4 tos") Acked-by: Guillaume Nault Signed-off-by: Matthias May Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski --- drivers/net/geneve.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/geneve.c b/drivers/net/geneve.c index fafe7dea2227..7962c37b3f14 100644 --- a/drivers/net/geneve.c +++ b/drivers/net/geneve.c @@ -879,8 +879,7 @@ static struct dst_entry *geneve_get_v6_dst(struct sk_buff *skb, use_cache = false; } - fl6->flowlabel = ip6_make_flowinfo(RT_TOS(prio), - info->key.label); + fl6->flowlabel = ip6_make_flowinfo(prio, info->key.label); dst_cache = (struct dst_cache *)&info->dst_cache; if (use_cache) { dst = dst_cache_get_ip6(dst_cache, &fl6->saddr); From e488d4f5d6e4cd1e728ba4ddbdcd7ef5f4d13a21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias May Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 21:19:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/4] vxlan: do not use RT_TOS for IPv6 flowlabel According to Guillaume Nault RT_TOS should never be used for IPv6. Quote: RT_TOS() is an old macro used to interprete IPv4 TOS as described in the obsolete RFC 1349. It's conceptually wrong to use it even in IPv4 code, although, given the current state of the code, most of the existing calls have no consequence. But using RT_TOS() in IPv6 code is always a bug: IPv6 never had a "TOS" field to be interpreted the RFC 1349 way. There's no historical compatibility to worry about. Fixes: 1400615d64cf ("vxlan: allow setting ipv6 traffic class") Acked-by: Guillaume Nault Signed-off-by: Matthias May Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski --- drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c index 90811ab851fd..c3285242f74f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c @@ -2321,7 +2321,7 @@ static struct dst_entry *vxlan6_get_route(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan, fl6.flowi6_oif = oif; fl6.daddr = *daddr; fl6.saddr = *saddr; - fl6.flowlabel = ip6_make_flowinfo(RT_TOS(tos), label); + fl6.flowlabel = ip6_make_flowinfo(tos, label); fl6.flowi6_mark = skb->mark; fl6.flowi6_proto = IPPROTO_UDP; fl6.fl6_dport = dport; From bcb0da7fffee9464073998b267ce5543da2356d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias May Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 21:19:05 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] mlx5: do not use RT_TOS for IPv6 flowlabel According to Guillaume Nault RT_TOS should never be used for IPv6. Quote: RT_TOS() is an old macro used to interprete IPv4 TOS as described in the obsolete RFC 1349. It's conceptually wrong to use it even in IPv4 code, although, given the current state of the code, most of the existing calls have no consequence. But using RT_TOS() in IPv6 code is always a bug: IPv6 never had a "TOS" field to be interpreted the RFC 1349 way. There's no historical compatibility to worry about. Fixes: ce99f6b97fcd ("net/mlx5e: Support SRIOV TC encapsulation offloads for IPv6 tunnels") Acked-by: Guillaume Nault Signed-off-by: Matthias May Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c index d87bbb0be7c8..e6f64d890fb3 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c @@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ int mlx5e_tc_tun_create_header_ipv6(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, int err; attr.ttl = tun_key->ttl; - attr.fl.fl6.flowlabel = ip6_make_flowinfo(RT_TOS(tun_key->tos), tun_key->label); + attr.fl.fl6.flowlabel = ip6_make_flowinfo(tun_key->tos, tun_key->label); attr.fl.fl6.daddr = tun_key->u.ipv6.dst; attr.fl.fl6.saddr = tun_key->u.ipv6.src; @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ int mlx5e_tc_tun_update_header_ipv6(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, attr.ttl = tun_key->ttl; - attr.fl.fl6.flowlabel = ip6_make_flowinfo(RT_TOS(tun_key->tos), tun_key->label); + attr.fl.fl6.flowlabel = ip6_make_flowinfo(tun_key->tos, tun_key->label); attr.fl.fl6.daddr = tun_key->u.ipv6.dst; attr.fl.fl6.saddr = tun_key->u.ipv6.src; From ab7e2e0dfa5d37540ab1dc5376e9a2cb9188925d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias May Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 21:19:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 4/4] ipv6: do not use RT_TOS for IPv6 flowlabel According to Guillaume Nault RT_TOS should never be used for IPv6. Quote: RT_TOS() is an old macro used to interprete IPv4 TOS as described in the obsolete RFC 1349. It's conceptually wrong to use it even in IPv4 code, although, given the current state of the code, most of the existing calls have no consequence. But using RT_TOS() in IPv6 code is always a bug: IPv6 never had a "TOS" field to be interpreted the RFC 1349 way. There's no historical compatibility to worry about. Fixes: 571912c69f0e ("net: UDP tunnel encapsulation module for tunnelling different protocols like MPLS, IP, NSH etc.") Acked-by: Guillaume Nault Signed-off-by: Matthias May Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski --- net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c index 897ca4f9b791..f152e51242cb 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c @@ -1311,8 +1311,7 @@ struct dst_entry *ip6_dst_lookup_tunnel(struct sk_buff *skb, fl6.daddr = info->key.u.ipv6.dst; fl6.saddr = info->key.u.ipv6.src; prio = info->key.tos; - fl6.flowlabel = ip6_make_flowinfo(RT_TOS(prio), - info->key.label); + fl6.flowlabel = ip6_make_flowinfo(prio, info->key.label); dst = ipv6_stub->ipv6_dst_lookup_flow(net, sock->sk, &fl6, NULL);