From 95fb5b0258b7bd2d540102771e31cfd76b72aa7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Gardon Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 11:26:58 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] kvm: x86/mmu: Support MMIO in the TDP MMU In order to support MMIO, KVM must be able to walk the TDP paging structures to find mappings for a given GFN. Support this walk for the TDP MMU. Tested by running kvm-unit-tests and KVM selftests on an Intel Haswell machine. This series introduced no new failures. This series can be viewed in Gerrit at: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/c/virt/kvm/kvm/+/2538 v2: Thanks to Dan Carpenter and kernel test robot for finding that root was used uninitialized in get_mmio_spte. Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon Reported-by: kernel test robot Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Message-Id: <20201014182700.2888246-19-bgardon@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 21 ++++++++++++ arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index 4c62ac8db169..6a0941ccac34 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -3479,54 +3479,82 @@ static bool mmio_info_in_cache(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, bool direct) return vcpu_match_mmio_gva(vcpu, addr); } -/* return true if reserved bit is detected on spte. */ -static bool -walk_shadow_page_get_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptep) +/* + * Return the level of the lowest level SPTE added to sptes. + * That SPTE may be non-present. + */ +static int get_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptes) { struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator iterator; - u64 sptes[PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL], spte = 0ull; - struct rsvd_bits_validate *rsvd_check; - int root, leaf; - bool reserved = false; + int leaf = vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level; + u64 spte; - rsvd_check = &vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_zero_check; walk_shadow_page_lockless_begin(vcpu); - for (shadow_walk_init(&iterator, vcpu, addr), - leaf = root = iterator.level; + for (shadow_walk_init(&iterator, vcpu, addr); shadow_walk_okay(&iterator); __shadow_walk_next(&iterator, spte)) { + leaf = iterator.level; spte = mmu_spte_get_lockless(iterator.sptep); sptes[leaf - 1] = spte; - leaf--; if (!is_shadow_present_pte(spte)) break; + } + + walk_shadow_page_lockless_end(vcpu); + + return leaf; +} + +/* return true if reserved bit is detected on spte. */ +static bool get_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptep) +{ + u64 sptes[PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL]; + struct rsvd_bits_validate *rsvd_check; + int root = vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level; + int leaf; + int level; + bool reserved = false; + + if (!VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa)) { + *sptep = 0ull; + return reserved; + } + + if (is_tdp_mmu_root(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->arch.mmu->root_hpa)) + leaf = kvm_tdp_mmu_get_walk(vcpu, addr, sptes); + else + leaf = get_walk(vcpu, addr, sptes); + + rsvd_check = &vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_zero_check; + + for (level = root; level >= leaf; level--) { + if (!is_shadow_present_pte(sptes[level - 1])) + break; /* * Use a bitwise-OR instead of a logical-OR to aggregate the * reserved bit and EPT's invalid memtype/XWR checks to avoid * adding a Jcc in the loop. */ - reserved |= __is_bad_mt_xwr(rsvd_check, spte) | - __is_rsvd_bits_set(rsvd_check, spte, iterator.level); + reserved |= __is_bad_mt_xwr(rsvd_check, sptes[level - 1]) | + __is_rsvd_bits_set(rsvd_check, sptes[level - 1], + level); } - walk_shadow_page_lockless_end(vcpu); - if (reserved) { pr_err("%s: detect reserved bits on spte, addr 0x%llx, dump hierarchy:\n", __func__, addr); - while (root > leaf) { + for (level = root; level >= leaf; level--) pr_err("------ spte 0x%llx level %d.\n", - sptes[root - 1], root); - root--; - } + sptes[level - 1], level); } - *sptep = spte; + *sptep = sptes[leaf - 1]; + return reserved; } @@ -3538,7 +3566,7 @@ static int handle_mmio_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, bool direct) if (mmio_info_in_cache(vcpu, addr, direct)) return RET_PF_EMULATE; - reserved = walk_shadow_page_get_mmio_spte(vcpu, addr, &spte); + reserved = get_mmio_spte(vcpu, addr, &spte); if (WARN_ON(reserved)) return -EINVAL; diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c index 1491e2f7a897..5158d02b8925 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c @@ -7,7 +7,10 @@ #include "tdp_mmu.h" #include "spte.h" +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 static bool __read_mostly tdp_mmu_enabled = false; +module_param_named(tdp_mmu, tdp_mmu_enabled, bool, 0644); +#endif static bool is_tdp_mmu_enabled(void) { @@ -1128,3 +1131,21 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_write_protect_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, return spte_set; } +/* + * Return the level of the lowest level SPTE added to sptes. + * That SPTE may be non-present. + */ +int kvm_tdp_mmu_get_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptes) +{ + struct tdp_iter iter; + struct kvm_mmu *mmu = vcpu->arch.mmu; + int leaf = vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_root_level; + gfn_t gfn = addr >> PAGE_SHIFT; + + tdp_mmu_for_each_pte(iter, mmu, gfn, gfn + 1) { + leaf = iter.level; + sptes[leaf - 1] = iter.old_spte; + } + + return leaf; +} diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h index 6501dd2ef8e4..556e065503f6 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h @@ -43,4 +43,6 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm, bool kvm_tdp_mmu_write_protect_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn); + +int kvm_tdp_mmu_get_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptes); #endif /* __KVM_X86_MMU_TDP_MMU_H */