mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-22 12:11:40 +00:00
afs: Dispatch fileserver probes in priority order
When probing all the addresses for a fileserver, dispatch them in order of descending priority to try and get back highest priority one first. Also add a tracepoint to show the transmission and completion of the probes. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
d14cf8edd3
commit
92f091cddd
@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ void afs_fileserver_probe_result(struct afs_call *call)
|
||||
struct afs_address *addr = &alist->addrs[call->probe_index];
|
||||
struct afs_server *server = call->server;
|
||||
unsigned int index = call->probe_index;
|
||||
unsigned int rtt_us = 0, cap0;
|
||||
unsigned int rtt_us = -1, cap0;
|
||||
int ret = call->error;
|
||||
|
||||
_enter("%pU,%u", &server->uuid, index);
|
||||
@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ responded:
|
||||
out:
|
||||
spin_unlock(&server->probe_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
trace_afs_fs_probe(server, false, alist, index, call->error, call->abort_code, rtt_us);
|
||||
_debug("probe %pU [%u] %pISpc rtt=%d ret=%d",
|
||||
&server->uuid, index, rxrpc_kernel_remote_addr(alist->addrs[index].peer),
|
||||
rtt_us, ret);
|
||||
@ -207,6 +208,8 @@ void afs_fs_probe_fileserver(struct afs_net *net, struct afs_server *server,
|
||||
afs_get_addrlist(alist, afs_alist_trace_get_probe);
|
||||
read_unlock(&server->fs_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
afs_get_address_preferences(net, alist);
|
||||
|
||||
server->probed_at = jiffies;
|
||||
atomic_set(&server->probe_outstanding, all ? alist->nr_addrs : 1);
|
||||
memset(&server->probe, 0, sizeof(server->probe));
|
||||
@ -217,10 +220,28 @@ void afs_fs_probe_fileserver(struct afs_net *net, struct afs_server *server,
|
||||
all = true;
|
||||
|
||||
if (all) {
|
||||
for (index = 0; index < alist->nr_addrs; index++)
|
||||
unsigned long unprobed = (1UL << alist->nr_addrs) - 1;
|
||||
unsigned int i;
|
||||
int best_prio;
|
||||
|
||||
while (unprobed) {
|
||||
best_prio = -1;
|
||||
index = 0;
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < alist->nr_addrs; i++) {
|
||||
if (test_bit(i, &unprobed) &&
|
||||
alist->addrs[i].prio > best_prio) {
|
||||
index = i;
|
||||
best_prio = alist->addrs[i].prio;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
__clear_bit(index, &unprobed);
|
||||
|
||||
trace_afs_fs_probe(server, true, alist, index, 0, 0, 0);
|
||||
if (!afs_fs_get_capabilities(net, server, alist, index, key))
|
||||
afs_fs_probe_not_done(net, server, alist, index);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
trace_afs_fs_probe(server, true, alist, index, 0, 0, 0);
|
||||
if (!afs_fs_get_capabilities(net, server, alist, index, key))
|
||||
afs_fs_probe_not_done(net, server, alist, index);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1387,6 +1387,39 @@ TRACE_EVENT(afs_alist,
|
||||
__entry->ref)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
TRACE_EVENT(afs_fs_probe,
|
||||
TP_PROTO(struct afs_server *server, bool tx, struct afs_addr_list *alist,
|
||||
unsigned int addr_index, int error, s32 abort_code, unsigned int rtt_us),
|
||||
|
||||
TP_ARGS(server, tx, alist, addr_index, error, abort_code, rtt_us),
|
||||
|
||||
TP_STRUCT__entry(
|
||||
__field(unsigned int, server)
|
||||
__field(bool, tx)
|
||||
__field(u16, addr_index)
|
||||
__field(short, error)
|
||||
__field(s32, abort_code)
|
||||
__field(unsigned int, rtt_us)
|
||||
__field_struct(struct sockaddr_rxrpc, srx)
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
||||
TP_fast_assign(
|
||||
__entry->server = server->debug_id;
|
||||
__entry->tx = tx;
|
||||
__entry->addr_index = addr_index;
|
||||
__entry->error = error;
|
||||
__entry->abort_code = abort_code;
|
||||
__entry->rtt_us = rtt_us;
|
||||
memcpy(&__entry->srx, rxrpc_kernel_remote_srx(alist->addrs[addr_index].peer),
|
||||
sizeof(__entry->srx));
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
||||
TP_printk("s=%08x %s ax=%u e=%d ac=%d rtt=%d %pISpc",
|
||||
__entry->server, __entry->tx ? "tx" : "rx", __entry->addr_index,
|
||||
__entry->error, __entry->abort_code, __entry->rtt_us,
|
||||
&__entry->srx.transport)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* _TRACE_AFS_H */
|
||||
|
||||
/* This part must be outside protection */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user