arm64: fix types in copy_highpage()

In copy_highpage() the `kto` and `kfrom` local variables are pointers to
struct page, but these are used to hold arbitrary pointers to kernel memory
. Each call to page_address() returns a void pointer to memory associated
with the relevant page, and copy_page() expects void pointers to this
memory.

This inconsistency was introduced in commit 2563776b41 ("arm64: mte:
Tags-aware copy_{user_,}highpage() implementations") and while this
doesn't appear to be harmful in practice it is clearly wrong.

Correct this by making `kto` and `kfrom` void pointers.

Fixes: 2563776b41 ("arm64: mte: Tags-aware copy_{user_,}highpage() implementations")
Signed-off-by: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220420030418.3189040-3-tongtiangen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Tong Tiangen 2022-04-20 03:04:13 +00:00 committed by Catalin Marinas
parent 5028fbad2d
commit 921d161f15

View File

@ -16,8 +16,8 @@
void copy_highpage(struct page *to, struct page *from) void copy_highpage(struct page *to, struct page *from)
{ {
struct page *kto = page_address(to); void *kto = page_address(to);
struct page *kfrom = page_address(from); void *kfrom = page_address(from);
copy_page(kto, kfrom); copy_page(kto, kfrom);