mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-23 04:31:50 +00:00
net: sctp: confirm route during forward progress
This fix has been proposed originally by Vlad Yasevich. He says: When SCTP makes forward progress (receives a SACK that acks new chunks, renegs, or answeres 0-window probes) or when HB-ACK arrives, mark the route as confirmed so we don't unnecessarily send NUD probes. Having a simple SCTP client/server that exchange data chunks every 1sec, without this patch ARP requests are sent periodically every 40-60sec. With this fix applied, an ARP request is only done once right at the "session" beginning. Also, when clearing the related ARP cache entry manually during the session, a new request is correctly done. I have only "backported" this to net-next and tested that it works, so full credit goes to Vlad. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e1d6fbc3de
commit
8c2f414ad1
@ -1334,6 +1334,7 @@ static void sctp_check_transmitted(struct sctp_outq *q,
|
||||
__u8 restart_timer = 0;
|
||||
int bytes_acked = 0;
|
||||
int migrate_bytes = 0;
|
||||
bool forward_progress = false;
|
||||
|
||||
sack_ctsn = ntohl(sack->cum_tsn_ack);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1400,6 +1401,7 @@ static void sctp_check_transmitted(struct sctp_outq *q,
|
||||
bytes_acked += sctp_data_size(tchunk);
|
||||
if (!tchunk->transport)
|
||||
migrate_bytes += sctp_data_size(tchunk);
|
||||
forward_progress = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (TSN_lte(tsn, sack_ctsn)) {
|
||||
@ -1413,6 +1415,7 @@ static void sctp_check_transmitted(struct sctp_outq *q,
|
||||
* current RTO.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
restart_timer = 1;
|
||||
forward_progress = true;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!tchunk->tsn_gap_acked) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -1503,6 +1506,7 @@ static void sctp_check_transmitted(struct sctp_outq *q,
|
||||
*/
|
||||
transport->error_count = 0;
|
||||
transport->asoc->overall_error_count = 0;
|
||||
forward_progress = true;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* While in SHUTDOWN PENDING, we may have started
|
||||
@ -1576,6 +1580,11 @@ static void sctp_check_transmitted(struct sctp_outq *q,
|
||||
jiffies + transport->rto))
|
||||
sctp_transport_hold(transport);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (forward_progress) {
|
||||
if (transport->dst)
|
||||
dst_confirm(transport->dst);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
list_splice(&tlist, transmitted_queue);
|
||||
|
@ -730,6 +730,12 @@ static void sctp_cmd_transport_on(sctp_cmd_seq_t *cmds,
|
||||
sctp_assoc_control_transport(asoc, t, SCTP_TRANSPORT_UP,
|
||||
SCTP_HEARTBEAT_SUCCESS);
|
||||
|
||||
/* HB-ACK was received for a the proper HB. Consider this
|
||||
* forward progress.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (t->dst)
|
||||
dst_confirm(t->dst);
|
||||
|
||||
/* The receiver of the HEARTBEAT ACK should also perform an
|
||||
* RTT measurement for that destination transport address
|
||||
* using the time value carried in the HEARTBEAT ACK chunk.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user