mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-24 05:02:12 +00:00
tipc: Fix node lock reclamation issues in broadcast link reception
Fixes a pair of problems in broadcast link message reception code relating to the reclamation of the node lock after consuming an in-sequence message. 1) Now retests to see if the sending node is still up after reclaiming the node lock, and bails out if it is non-operational. 2) Now manipulates the node's deferred message queue only after reclaiming the node lock, rather than using queue head pointer information that was cached previously. Signed-off-by: Allan Stephens <allan.stephens@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
57732560d1
commit
8a275a6a30
@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ void tipc_bclink_recv_pkt(struct sk_buff *buf)
|
||||
struct tipc_node *node;
|
||||
u32 next_in;
|
||||
u32 seqno;
|
||||
struct sk_buff *deferred;
|
||||
int deferred;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Screen out unwanted broadcast messages */
|
||||
|
||||
@ -489,6 +489,8 @@ void tipc_bclink_recv_pkt(struct sk_buff *buf)
|
||||
if (unlikely(!node->bclink.supported))
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Handle broadcast protocol message */
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(msg_user(msg) == BCAST_PROTOCOL)) {
|
||||
if (msg_type(msg) != STATE_MSG)
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
@ -513,11 +515,11 @@ void tipc_bclink_recv_pkt(struct sk_buff *buf)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Handle in-sequence broadcast message */
|
||||
|
||||
receive:
|
||||
next_in = mod(node->bclink.last_in + 1);
|
||||
seqno = msg_seqno(msg);
|
||||
next_in = mod(node->bclink.last_in + 1);
|
||||
|
||||
if (likely(seqno == next_in)) {
|
||||
receive:
|
||||
bcl->stats.recv_info++;
|
||||
node->bclink.last_in++;
|
||||
bclink_set_gap(node);
|
||||
@ -551,23 +553,40 @@ receive:
|
||||
buf_discard(buf);
|
||||
}
|
||||
buf = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Determine new synchronization state */
|
||||
|
||||
tipc_node_lock(node);
|
||||
deferred = node->bclink.deferred_head;
|
||||
if (deferred && (buf_seqno(deferred) == mod(next_in + 1))) {
|
||||
buf = deferred;
|
||||
msg = buf_msg(buf);
|
||||
node->bclink.deferred_head = deferred->next;
|
||||
goto receive;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (less(next_in, seqno)) {
|
||||
if (unlikely(!tipc_node_is_up(node)))
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!node->bclink.deferred_head)
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
msg = buf_msg(node->bclink.deferred_head);
|
||||
seqno = msg_seqno(msg);
|
||||
next_in = mod(next_in + 1);
|
||||
if (seqno != next_in)
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Take in-sequence message from deferred queue & deliver it */
|
||||
|
||||
buf = node->bclink.deferred_head;
|
||||
node->bclink.deferred_head = buf->next;
|
||||
goto receive;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Handle out-of-sequence broadcast message */
|
||||
|
||||
if (less(next_in, seqno)) {
|
||||
u32 gap_after = node->bclink.gap_after;
|
||||
u32 gap_to = node->bclink.gap_to;
|
||||
|
||||
if (tipc_link_defer_pkt(&node->bclink.deferred_head,
|
||||
&node->bclink.deferred_tail,
|
||||
buf)) {
|
||||
deferred = tipc_link_defer_pkt(&node->bclink.deferred_head,
|
||||
&node->bclink.deferred_tail,
|
||||
buf);
|
||||
if (deferred) {
|
||||
node->bclink.nack_sync++;
|
||||
bcl->stats.deferred_recv++;
|
||||
if (seqno == mod(gap_after + 1))
|
||||
node->bclink.gap_after = seqno;
|
||||
else if (less(gap_after, seqno) && less(seqno, gap_to))
|
||||
@ -579,9 +598,12 @@ receive:
|
||||
bclink_send_nack(node);
|
||||
bclink_set_gap(node);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
bcl->stats.duplicates++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else
|
||||
deferred = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (deferred)
|
||||
bcl->stats.deferred_recv++;
|
||||
|
||||
unlock:
|
||||
tipc_node_unlock(node);
|
||||
exit:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user