mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-22 12:11:40 +00:00
[PATCH] genirq core: fix handle_level_irq()
while porting the -rt tree to 2.6.18-rc7 i noticed the following screaming-IRQ scenario on an SMP system: 2274 0Dn.:1 0.001ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103 <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf) 2274 0Dn.:1 0.010ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103 <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf) 2274 0Dn.:1 0.020ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103 <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf) 2274 0Dn.:1 0.029ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103 <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf) 2274 0Dn.:1 0.039ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103 <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf) 2274 0Dn.:1 0.048ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103 <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf) 2274 0Dn.:1 0.058ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103 <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf) 2274 0Dn.:1 0.068ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103 <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf) 2274 0Dn.:1 0.077ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103 <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf) 2274 0Dn.:1 0.087ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103 <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf) 2274 0Dn.:1 0.097ms: do_IRQ+0xc/0x103 <= (ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf) as it turns out, the bug is caused by handle_level_irq(), which if it races with another CPU already handling this IRQ, it _unmasks_ the IRQ line on the way out. This is not how 2.6.17 works, and we introduced this bug in one of the early genirq cleanups right before it went into -mm. (the bug was not in the genirq patchset for a long time, and we didnt notice the bug due to the lack of -rt rebase to the new genirq code. -rt, and hardirq-preemption in particular opens up such races much wider than anything else.) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
47a5c6fa0e
commit
86998aa653
@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ handle_level_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
mask_ack_irq(desc, irq);
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(desc->status & IRQ_INPROGRESS))
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
desc->status &= ~(IRQ_REPLAY | IRQ_WAITING);
|
||||
kstat_cpu(cpu).irqs[irq]++;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ handle_level_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
action = desc->action;
|
||||
if (unlikely(!action || (desc->status & IRQ_DISABLED))) {
|
||||
desc->status |= IRQ_PENDING;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
desc->status |= IRQ_INPROGRESS;
|
||||
@ -276,9 +276,9 @@ handle_level_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&desc->lock);
|
||||
desc->status &= ~IRQ_INPROGRESS;
|
||||
out:
|
||||
if (!(desc->status & IRQ_DISABLED) && desc->chip->unmask)
|
||||
desc->chip->unmask(irq);
|
||||
out_unlock:
|
||||
spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user