Minki/linux
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git synced 2024-10-26 06:54:41 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

rcu: Uninline rcu_read_lock_held()

Browse Source 
This commit uninlines rcu_read_lock_held(). According to "size vmlinux"
this saves 28549 in .text:

	- 5541731 3014560 14757888 23314179
	+ 5513182 3026848 14757888 23297918

Note: it looks as if the data grows by 12288 bytes but this is not true,
it does not actually grow. But .data starts with ALIGN(THREAD_SIZE) and
since .text shrinks the padding grows, and thus .data grows too as it
seen by /bin/size. diff System.map:

	- ffffffff81510000 D _sdata
	- ffffffff81510000 D init_thread_union
	+ ffffffff81509000 D _sdata
	+ ffffffff8150c000 D init_thread_union

Perhaps we can change vmlinux.lds.S to .data itself, so that /bin/size
can't "wrongly" report that .data grows if .text shinks.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Oleg Nesterov 2014-07-08 15:17:59 -07:00 committed by Paul E. McKenney
parent e02b2edfa1
commit 85b39d305b
2 changed files with 33 additions and 35 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

36
include/linux/rcupdate.h
View File

@ -371,41 +371,7 @@ extern struct lockdep_map rcu_sched_lock_map;
extern struct lockdep_map rcu_callback_map;
int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void);
/**
* rcu_read_lock_held() - might we be in RCU read-side critical section?
*
* If CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is selected, returns nonzero iff in an RCU
* read-side critical section. In absence of CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC,
* this assumes we are in an RCU read-side critical section unless it can
* prove otherwise. This is useful for debug checks in functions that
* require that they be called within an RCU read-side critical section.
*
* Checks debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() to prevent false positives during boot
* and while lockdep is disabled.
*
* Note that rcu_read_lock() and the matching rcu_read_unlock() must
* occur in the same context, for example, it is illegal to invoke
* rcu_read_unlock() in process context if the matching rcu_read_lock()
* was invoked from within an irq handler.
*
* Note that rcu_read_lock() is disallowed if the CPU is either idle or
* offline from an RCU perspective, so check for those as well.
*/
static inline int rcu_read_lock_held(void)
{
if (!debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled())
return 1;
if (!rcu_is_watching())
return 0;
if (!rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online())
return 0;
return lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map);
}
/*
* rcu_read_lock_bh_held() is defined out of line to avoid #include-file
* hell.
*/
int rcu_read_lock_held(void);
int rcu_read_lock_bh_held(void);
/**

32
kernel/rcu/update.c
View File

@ -136,6 +136,38 @@ int notrace debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled);
/**
* rcu_read_lock_held() - might we be in RCU read-side critical section?
*
* If CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is selected, returns nonzero iff in an RCU
* read-side critical section. In absence of CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC,
* this assumes we are in an RCU read-side critical section unless it can
* prove otherwise. This is useful for debug checks in functions that
* require that they be called within an RCU read-side critical section.
*
* Checks debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() to prevent false positives during boot
* and while lockdep is disabled.
*
* Note that rcu_read_lock() and the matching rcu_read_unlock() must
* occur in the same context, for example, it is illegal to invoke
* rcu_read_unlock() in process context if the matching rcu_read_lock()
* was invoked from within an irq handler.
*
* Note that rcu_read_lock() is disallowed if the CPU is either idle or
* offline from an RCU perspective, so check for those as well.
*/
int rcu_read_lock_held(void)
{
if (!debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled())
return 1;
if (!rcu_is_watching())
return 0;
if (!rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online())
return 0;
return lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_read_lock_held);
/**
* rcu_read_lock_bh_held() - might we be in RCU-bh read-side critical section?
*