mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-25 13:41:51 +00:00
Turn do_link spaghetty into a normal loop
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
10fa8e62f2
commit
806b681cbe
83
fs/namei.c
83
fs/namei.c
@ -1844,17 +1844,38 @@ reval:
|
||||
if (open_flag & O_EXCL)
|
||||
nd.flags |= LOOKUP_EXCL;
|
||||
filp = do_last(&nd, &path, open_flag, acc_mode, mode, pathname);
|
||||
if (!filp)
|
||||
goto do_link;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
exit_dput:
|
||||
path_put_conditional(&path, &nd);
|
||||
if (!IS_ERR(nd.intent.open.file))
|
||||
release_open_intent(&nd);
|
||||
exit_parent:
|
||||
path_put(&nd.path);
|
||||
filp = ERR_PTR(error);
|
||||
while (unlikely(!filp)) { /* trailing symlink */
|
||||
error = -ELOOP;
|
||||
if ((open_flag & O_NOFOLLOW) || count++ == 32)
|
||||
goto exit_dput;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This is subtle. Instead of calling do_follow_link() we do
|
||||
* the thing by hands. The reason is that this way we have zero
|
||||
* link_count and path_walk() (called from ->follow_link)
|
||||
* honoring LOOKUP_PARENT. After that we have the parent and
|
||||
* last component, i.e. we are in the same situation as after
|
||||
* the first path_walk(). Well, almost - if the last component
|
||||
* is normal we get its copy stored in nd->last.name and we will
|
||||
* have to putname() it when we are done. Procfs-like symlinks
|
||||
* just set LAST_BIND.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
nd.flags |= LOOKUP_PARENT;
|
||||
error = security_inode_follow_link(path.dentry, &nd);
|
||||
if (error)
|
||||
goto exit_dput;
|
||||
error = __do_follow_link(&path, &nd);
|
||||
path_put(&path);
|
||||
if (error) {
|
||||
/* nd.path had been dropped */
|
||||
release_open_intent(&nd);
|
||||
filp = ERR_PTR(error);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
nd.flags &= ~LOOKUP_PARENT;
|
||||
filp = do_last(&nd, &path, open_flag, acc_mode, mode, pathname);
|
||||
if (nd.last_type == LAST_NORM)
|
||||
__putname(nd.last.name);
|
||||
}
|
||||
out:
|
||||
if (nd.root.mnt)
|
||||
path_put(&nd.root);
|
||||
@ -1864,41 +1885,13 @@ out:
|
||||
}
|
||||
return filp;
|
||||
|
||||
do_link:
|
||||
error = -ELOOP;
|
||||
if ((open_flag & O_NOFOLLOW) || count++ == 32)
|
||||
goto exit_dput;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This is subtle. Instead of calling do_follow_link() we do the
|
||||
* thing by hands. The reason is that this way we have zero link_count
|
||||
* and path_walk() (called from ->follow_link) honoring LOOKUP_PARENT.
|
||||
* After that we have the parent and last component, i.e.
|
||||
* we are in the same situation as after the first path_walk().
|
||||
* Well, almost - if the last component is normal we get its copy
|
||||
* stored in nd->last.name and we will have to putname() it when we
|
||||
* are done. Procfs-like symlinks just set LAST_BIND.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
nd.flags |= LOOKUP_PARENT;
|
||||
error = security_inode_follow_link(path.dentry, &nd);
|
||||
if (error)
|
||||
goto exit_dput;
|
||||
error = __do_follow_link(&path, &nd);
|
||||
path_put(&path);
|
||||
if (error) {
|
||||
/* Does someone understand code flow here? Or it is only
|
||||
* me so stupid? Anathema to whoever designed this non-sense
|
||||
* with "intent.open".
|
||||
*/
|
||||
exit_dput:
|
||||
path_put_conditional(&path, &nd);
|
||||
if (!IS_ERR(nd.intent.open.file))
|
||||
release_open_intent(&nd);
|
||||
filp = ERR_PTR(error);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
nd.flags &= ~LOOKUP_PARENT;
|
||||
filp = do_last(&nd, &path, open_flag, acc_mode, mode, pathname);
|
||||
if (nd.last_type == LAST_NORM)
|
||||
__putname(nd.last.name);
|
||||
if (!filp)
|
||||
goto do_link;
|
||||
exit_parent:
|
||||
path_put(&nd.path);
|
||||
filp = ERR_PTR(error);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user