ALSA: opti9xx: mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 402016 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1056542 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1339579 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1369526 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1369529 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
Gustavo A. R. Silva 2018-08-02 15:41:55 -05:00 committed by Takashi Iwai
parent 3e313f3472
commit 734be97b96

View File

@ -176,10 +176,13 @@ static int aci_busy_wait(struct snd_miro_aci *aci)
switch (timeout-ACI_MINTIME) {
case 0 ... 9:
out /= 10;
/* fall through */
case 10 ... 19:
out /= 10;
/* fall through */
case 20 ... 30:
out /= 10;
/* fall through */
default:
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule_timeout(out);
@ -834,6 +837,7 @@ static unsigned char snd_miro_read(struct snd_miro *chip,
retval = inb(chip->mc_base + 9);
break;
}
/* fall through */
case OPTi9XX_HW_82C929:
retval = inb(chip->mc_base + reg);
@ -863,6 +867,7 @@ static void snd_miro_write(struct snd_miro *chip, unsigned char reg,
outb(value, chip->mc_base + 9);
break;
}
/* fall through */
case OPTi9XX_HW_82C929:
outb(value, chip->mc_base + reg);