mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-24 05:02:12 +00:00
Documentation: remove overloads-avoided counter from knfsd-stats.txt
The 'overloads-avoided' counter itself was removed several years ago by
commit 78c210e
(Revert "knfsd: avoid overloading the CPU scheduler with
enormous load averages").
Signed-off-by: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fd89145460
commit
72faedae8b
@ -68,16 +68,10 @@ sockets-enqueued
|
||||
rate of change for this counter is zero; significantly non-zero
|
||||
values may indicate a performance limitation.
|
||||
|
||||
This can happen either because there are too few nfsd threads in the
|
||||
thread pool for the NFS workload (the workload is thread-limited),
|
||||
or because the NFS workload needs more CPU time than is available in
|
||||
the thread pool (the workload is CPU-limited). In the former case,
|
||||
configuring more nfsd threads will probably improve the performance
|
||||
of the NFS workload. In the latter case, the sunrpc server layer is
|
||||
already choosing not to wake idle nfsd threads because there are too
|
||||
many nfsd threads which want to run but cannot, so configuring more
|
||||
nfsd threads will make no difference whatsoever. The overloads-avoided
|
||||
statistic (see below) can be used to distinguish these cases.
|
||||
This can happen because there are too few nfsd threads in the thread
|
||||
pool for the NFS workload (the workload is thread-limited), in which
|
||||
case configuring more nfsd threads will probably improve the
|
||||
performance of the NFS workload.
|
||||
|
||||
threads-woken
|
||||
Counts how many times an idle nfsd thread is woken to try to
|
||||
@ -88,36 +82,6 @@ threads-woken
|
||||
thing. The ideal rate of change for this counter will be close
|
||||
to but less than the rate of change of the packets-arrived counter.
|
||||
|
||||
overloads-avoided
|
||||
Counts how many times the sunrpc server layer chose not to wake an
|
||||
nfsd thread, despite the presence of idle nfsd threads, because
|
||||
too many nfsd threads had been recently woken but could not get
|
||||
enough CPU time to actually run.
|
||||
|
||||
This statistic counts a circumstance where the sunrpc layer
|
||||
heuristically avoids overloading the CPU scheduler with too many
|
||||
runnable nfsd threads. The ideal rate of change for this counter
|
||||
is zero. Significant non-zero values indicate that the workload
|
||||
is CPU limited. Usually this is associated with heavy CPU usage
|
||||
on all the CPUs in the nfsd thread pool.
|
||||
|
||||
If a sustained large overloads-avoided rate is detected on a pool,
|
||||
the top(1) utility should be used to check for the following
|
||||
pattern of CPU usage on all the CPUs associated with the given
|
||||
nfsd thread pool.
|
||||
|
||||
- %us ~= 0 (as you're *NOT* running applications on your NFS server)
|
||||
|
||||
- %wa ~= 0
|
||||
|
||||
- %id ~= 0
|
||||
|
||||
- %sy + %hi + %si ~= 100
|
||||
|
||||
If this pattern is seen, configuring more nfsd threads will *not*
|
||||
improve the performance of the workload. If this patten is not
|
||||
seen, then something more subtle is wrong.
|
||||
|
||||
threads-timedout
|
||||
Counts how many times an nfsd thread triggered an idle timeout,
|
||||
i.e. was not woken to handle any incoming network packets for
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user