mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-23 20:51:44 +00:00
btrfs: only check priority tickets for priority flushing
In debugging a generic/320 failure on ppc64, Nikolay noticed that sometimes we'd ENOSPC out with plenty of space to reclaim if we had committed the transaction. He further discovered that this was because there was a priority ticket that was small enough to fit in the free space currently in the space_info. Consider the following scenario. There is no more space to reclaim in the fs without committing the transaction. Assume there's 1MiB of space free in the space info, but there are pending normal tickets with 2MiB reservations. Now a priority ticket comes in with a .5MiB reservation. Because we have normal tickets pending we add ourselves to the priority list, despite the fact that we could satisfy this reservation. The flushing machinery now gets to the point where it wants to commit the transaction, but because there's a .5MiB ticket on the priority list and we have 1MiB of free space we assume the ticket will be granted soon, so we bail without committing the transaction. Meanwhile the priority flushing does not commit the transaction, and eventually fails with an ENOSPC. Then all other tickets are failed with ENOSPC because we were never able to actually commit the transaction. The fix for this is we should have simply granted the priority flusher his reservation, because there was space to make the reservation. Priority flushers by definition take priority, so they are allowed to make their reservations before any previous normal tickets. By not adding this priority ticket to the list the normal flushing mechanisms will then commit the transaction and everything will continue normally. We still need to serialize ourselves with other priority tickets, so if there are any tickets on the priority list then we need to add ourselves to that list in order to maintain the serialization between priority tickets. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bb4f58a747
commit
666daa9f97
@ -1184,6 +1184,16 @@ static int handle_reserve_ticket(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This returns true if this flush state will go through the ordinary flushing
|
||||
* code.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline bool is_normal_flushing(enum btrfs_reserve_flush_enum flush)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return (flush == BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL) ||
|
||||
(flush == BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL_STEAL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* reserve_metadata_bytes - try to reserve bytes from the block_rsv's space
|
||||
* @root - the root we're allocating for
|
||||
@ -1214,8 +1224,17 @@ static int __reserve_metadata_bytes(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
||||
spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
|
||||
ret = -ENOSPC;
|
||||
used = btrfs_space_info_used(space_info, true);
|
||||
pending_tickets = !list_empty(&space_info->tickets) ||
|
||||
!list_empty(&space_info->priority_tickets);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We don't want NO_FLUSH allocations to jump everybody, they can
|
||||
* generally handle ENOSPC in a different way, so treat them the same as
|
||||
* normal flushers when it comes to skipping pending tickets.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (is_normal_flushing(flush) || (flush == BTRFS_RESERVE_NO_FLUSH))
|
||||
pending_tickets = !list_empty(&space_info->tickets) ||
|
||||
!list_empty(&space_info->priority_tickets);
|
||||
else
|
||||
pending_tickets = !list_empty(&space_info->priority_tickets);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Carry on if we have enough space (short-circuit) OR call
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user