mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-23 04:31:50 +00:00
ACPI / PM: Walk physical_node_list under physical_node_lock
The list of physical devices corresponding to an ACPI device object is walked by acpi_system_wakeup_device_seq_show() and physical_device_enable_wakeup() without taking that object's physical_node_lock mutex. Since each of those functions may be run at any time as a result of a user space action, the lack of appropriate locking in them may lead to a kernel crash if that happens during device hot-add or hot-remove involving the device object in question. Fix the issue by modifying acpi_system_wakeup_device_seq_show() and physical_device_enable_wakeup() to use physical_node_lock as appropriate. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: All <stable@vger.kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b3b301c5fe
commit
623cf33cb0
@ -311,6 +311,8 @@ acpi_system_wakeup_device_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
|
||||
dev->pnp.bus_id,
|
||||
(u32) dev->wakeup.sleep_state);
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&dev->physical_node_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!dev->physical_node_count) {
|
||||
seq_printf(seq, "%c%-8s\n",
|
||||
dev->wakeup.flags.run_wake ? '*' : ' ',
|
||||
@ -338,6 +340,8 @@ acpi_system_wakeup_device_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
|
||||
put_device(ldev);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dev->physical_node_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&acpi_device_lock);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
@ -347,12 +351,16 @@ static void physical_device_enable_wakeup(struct acpi_device *adev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct acpi_device_physical_node *entry;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(entry,
|
||||
&adev->physical_node_list, node)
|
||||
if (entry->dev && device_can_wakeup(entry->dev)) {
|
||||
bool enable = !device_may_wakeup(entry->dev);
|
||||
device_set_wakeup_enable(entry->dev, enable);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static ssize_t
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user