mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-26 14:12:06 +00:00
net/packet: tpacket_rcv: avoid a producer race condition
PACKET_RX_RING can cause multiple writers to access the same slot if a fast writer wraps the ring while a slow writer is still copying. This is particularly likely with few, large, slots (e.g., GSO packets). Synchronize kernel thread ownership of rx ring slots with a bitmap. Writers acquire a slot race-free by testing tp_status TP_STATUS_KERNEL while holding the sk receive queue lock. They release this lock before copying and set tp_status to TP_STATUS_USER to release to userspace when done. During copying, another writer may take the lock, also see TP_STATUS_KERNEL, and start writing to the same slot. Introduce a new rx_owner_map bitmap with a bit per slot. To acquire a slot, test and set with the lock held. To release race-free, update tp_status and owner bit as a transaction, so take the lock again. This is the one of a variety of discussed options (see Link below): * instead of a shadow ring, embed the data in the slot itself, such as in tp_padding. But any test for this field may match a value left by userspace, causing deadlock. * avoid the lock on release. This leaves a small race if releasing the shadow slot before setting TP_STATUS_USER. The below reproducer showed that this race is not academic. If releasing the slot after tp_status, the race is more subtle. See the first link for details. * add a new tp_status TP_KERNEL_OWNED to avoid the transactional store of two fields. But, legacy applications may interpret all non-zero tp_status as owned by the user. As libpcap does. So this is possible only opt-in by newer processes. It can be added as an optional mode. * embed the struct at the tail of pg_vec to avoid extra allocation. The implementation proved no less complex than a separate field. The additional locking cost on release adds contention, no different than scaling on multicore or multiqueue h/w. In practice, below reproducer nor small packet tcpdump showed a noticeable change in perf report in cycles spent in spinlock. Where contention is problematic, packet sockets support mitigation through PACKET_FANOUT. And we can consider adding opt-in state TP_KERNEL_OWNED. Easy to reproduce by running multiple netperf or similar TCP_STREAM flows concurrently with `tcpdump -B 129 -n greater 60000`. Based on an earlier patchset by Jon Rosen. See links below. I believe this issue goes back to the introduction of tpacket_rcv, which predates git history. Link: https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg237222.html Suggested-by: Jon Rosen <jrosen@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jon Rosen <jrosen@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e1f8f78ffe
commit
61fad6816f
@ -2173,6 +2173,7 @@ static int tpacket_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
|
||||
struct timespec64 ts;
|
||||
__u32 ts_status;
|
||||
bool is_drop_n_account = false;
|
||||
unsigned int slot_id = 0;
|
||||
bool do_vnet = false;
|
||||
|
||||
/* struct tpacket{2,3}_hdr is aligned to a multiple of TPACKET_ALIGNMENT.
|
||||
@ -2275,6 +2276,13 @@ static int tpacket_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
|
||||
if (!h.raw)
|
||||
goto drop_n_account;
|
||||
|
||||
if (po->tp_version <= TPACKET_V2) {
|
||||
slot_id = po->rx_ring.head;
|
||||
if (test_bit(slot_id, po->rx_ring.rx_owner_map))
|
||||
goto drop_n_account;
|
||||
__set_bit(slot_id, po->rx_ring.rx_owner_map);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (do_vnet &&
|
||||
virtio_net_hdr_from_skb(skb, h.raw + macoff -
|
||||
sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr),
|
||||
@ -2380,7 +2388,10 @@ static int tpacket_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
if (po->tp_version <= TPACKET_V2) {
|
||||
spin_lock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
|
||||
__packet_set_status(po, h.raw, status);
|
||||
__clear_bit(slot_id, po->rx_ring.rx_owner_map);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
|
||||
sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
prb_clear_blk_fill_status(&po->rx_ring);
|
||||
@ -4277,6 +4288,7 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *sk, union tpacket_req_u *req_u,
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct pgv *pg_vec = NULL;
|
||||
struct packet_sock *po = pkt_sk(sk);
|
||||
unsigned long *rx_owner_map = NULL;
|
||||
int was_running, order = 0;
|
||||
struct packet_ring_buffer *rb;
|
||||
struct sk_buff_head *rb_queue;
|
||||
@ -4362,6 +4374,12 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *sk, union tpacket_req_u *req_u,
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
if (!tx_ring) {
|
||||
rx_owner_map = bitmap_alloc(req->tp_frame_nr,
|
||||
GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_ZERO);
|
||||
if (!rx_owner_map)
|
||||
goto out_free_pg_vec;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -4391,6 +4409,8 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *sk, union tpacket_req_u *req_u,
|
||||
err = 0;
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&rb_queue->lock);
|
||||
swap(rb->pg_vec, pg_vec);
|
||||
if (po->tp_version <= TPACKET_V2)
|
||||
swap(rb->rx_owner_map, rx_owner_map);
|
||||
rb->frame_max = (req->tp_frame_nr - 1);
|
||||
rb->head = 0;
|
||||
rb->frame_size = req->tp_frame_size;
|
||||
@ -4422,6 +4442,7 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *sk, union tpacket_req_u *req_u,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
out_free_pg_vec:
|
||||
bitmap_free(rx_owner_map);
|
||||
if (pg_vec)
|
||||
free_pg_vec(pg_vec, order, req->tp_block_nr);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
|
@ -70,7 +70,10 @@ struct packet_ring_buffer {
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned int __percpu *pending_refcnt;
|
||||
|
||||
union {
|
||||
unsigned long *rx_owner_map;
|
||||
struct tpacket_kbdq_core prb_bdqc;
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
extern struct mutex fanout_mutex;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user