mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-25 13:41:51 +00:00
clk: imx: clk-fracn-gppll: Return rate in rate table properly in ->recalc_rate()
The PLL parameters in rate table should be directly compared with
those read from PLL registers instead of the cooked ones.
Fixes: 1b26cb8a77
("clk: imx: support fracn gppll")
Cc: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Ying <victor.liu@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220609132902.3504651-6-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
044034efbe
commit
5ebaf9f7da
@ -131,18 +131,7 @@ static unsigned long clk_fracn_gppll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned lon
|
||||
mfi = FIELD_GET(PLL_MFI_MASK, pll_div);
|
||||
|
||||
rdiv = FIELD_GET(PLL_RDIV_MASK, pll_div);
|
||||
rdiv = rdiv + 1;
|
||||
odiv = FIELD_GET(PLL_ODIV_MASK, pll_div);
|
||||
switch (odiv) {
|
||||
case 0:
|
||||
odiv = 2;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case 1:
|
||||
odiv = 3;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Sometimes, the recalculated rate has deviation due to
|
||||
@ -160,6 +149,19 @@ static unsigned long clk_fracn_gppll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned lon
|
||||
if (rate)
|
||||
return (unsigned long)rate;
|
||||
|
||||
rdiv = rdiv + 1;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (odiv) {
|
||||
case 0:
|
||||
odiv = 2;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case 1:
|
||||
odiv = 3;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Fvco = Fref * (MFI + MFN / MFD) */
|
||||
fvco = fvco * mfi * mfd + fvco * mfn;
|
||||
do_div(fvco, mfd * rdiv * odiv);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user