Minki/linux
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git synced 2024-11-22 12:11:40 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

seccomp: check in_compat_syscall, not is_compat_task, in strict mode

Browse Source 
Seccomp wants to know the syscall bitness, not the caller task bitness,
when it selects the syscall whitelist.

As far as I know, this makes no difference on any architecture, so it's
not a security problem.  (It generates identical code everywhere except
sparc, and, on sparc, the syscall numbering is the same for both ABIs.)

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Andy Lutomirski 2016-03-22 14:24:52 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 203f79078f
commit 5c38065e02
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
kernel/seccomp.c
View File

@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ seccomp_prepare_user_filter(const char __user *user_filter)
struct seccomp_filter *filter = ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
if (is_compat_task()) {
if (in_compat_syscall()) {
struct compat_sock_fprog fprog32;
if (copy_from_user(&fprog32, user_filter, sizeof(fprog32)))
goto out;
@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ static void __secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall)
{
int *syscall_whitelist = mode1_syscalls;
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
if (is_compat_task())
if (in_compat_syscall())
syscall_whitelist = mode1_syscalls_32;
#endif
do {