mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-24 13:11:40 +00:00
iommu/vt-d: Handle Caching Mode implementations of SVM
Not entirely clear why, but it seems we need to reserve PASID zero and flush it when we make a PASID entry present. Quite we we couldn't use the true PASID value, isn't clear. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5d52f482eb
commit
5a10ba27d9
@ -236,12 +236,12 @@ static void intel_invalidate_range(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
static void intel_flush_pasid_dev(struct intel_svm *svm, struct intel_svm_dev *sdev)
|
||||
static void intel_flush_pasid_dev(struct intel_svm *svm, struct intel_svm_dev *sdev, int pasid)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct qi_desc desc;
|
||||
|
||||
desc.high = 0;
|
||||
desc.low = QI_PC_TYPE | QI_PC_DID(sdev->did) | QI_PC_PASID_SEL | QI_PC_PASID(svm->pasid);
|
||||
desc.low = QI_PC_TYPE | QI_PC_DID(sdev->did) | QI_PC_PASID_SEL | QI_PC_PASID(pasid);
|
||||
|
||||
qi_submit_sync(&desc, svm->iommu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -356,8 +356,10 @@ int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, int *pasid, int flags, struct svm_dev_
|
||||
if (pasid_max > 2 << ecap_pss(iommu->ecap))
|
||||
pasid_max = 2 << ecap_pss(iommu->ecap);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = idr_alloc(&iommu->pasid_idr, svm, 0, pasid_max - 1,
|
||||
GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
/* Do not use PASID 0 in caching mode (virtualised IOMMU) */
|
||||
ret = idr_alloc(&iommu->pasid_idr, svm,
|
||||
!!cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap),
|
||||
pasid_max - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
if (ret < 0) {
|
||||
kfree(svm);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
@ -381,6 +383,17 @@ int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, int *pasid, int flags, struct svm_dev_
|
||||
} else
|
||||
iommu->pasid_table[svm->pasid].val = (u64)__pa(init_mm.pgd) | 1 | (1ULL << 11);
|
||||
wmb();
|
||||
/* In caching mode, we still have to flush with PASID 0 when
|
||||
* a PASID table entry becomes present. Not entirely clear
|
||||
* *why* that would be the case — surely we could just issue
|
||||
* a flush with the PASID value that we've changed? The PASID
|
||||
* is the index into the table, after all. It's not like domain
|
||||
* IDs in the case of the equivalent context-entry change in
|
||||
* caching mode. And for that matter it's not entirely clear why
|
||||
* a VMM would be in the business of caching the PASID table
|
||||
* anyway. Surely that can be left entirely to the guest? */
|
||||
if (cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap))
|
||||
intel_flush_pasid_dev(svm, sdev, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
list_add_rcu(&sdev->list, &svm->devs);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -424,7 +437,7 @@ int intel_svm_unbind_mm(struct device *dev, int pasid)
|
||||
* to use. We have a *shared* PASID table, because it's
|
||||
* large and has to be physically contiguous. So it's
|
||||
* hard to be as defensive as we might like. */
|
||||
intel_flush_pasid_dev(svm, sdev);
|
||||
intel_flush_pasid_dev(svm, sdev, svm->pasid);
|
||||
intel_flush_svm_range_dev(svm, sdev, 0, -1, 0, !svm->mm);
|
||||
kfree_rcu(sdev, rcu);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user