mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-26 06:02:05 +00:00
pcmcia: Use list_for_each_entry() for bus traversal
Replace list_for_each() + pci_bus_b() with list_for_each_entry(). [bhelgaas: fix "silbling" typo] Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3bc955987f
commit
560698e9d2
@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ static void yenta_config_init(struct yenta_socket *socket)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void yenta_fixup_parent_bridge(struct pci_bus *cardbus_bridge)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct list_head *tmp;
|
||||
struct pci_bus *sibling;
|
||||
unsigned char upper_limit;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We only check and fix the parent bridge: All systems which need
|
||||
@ -1095,18 +1095,18 @@ static void yenta_fixup_parent_bridge(struct pci_bus *cardbus_bridge)
|
||||
/* stay within the limits of the bus range of the parent: */
|
||||
upper_limit = bridge_to_fix->parent->busn_res.end;
|
||||
|
||||
/* check the bus ranges of all silbling bridges to prevent overlap */
|
||||
list_for_each(tmp, &bridge_to_fix->parent->children) {
|
||||
struct pci_bus *silbling = pci_bus_b(tmp);
|
||||
/* check the bus ranges of all sibling bridges to prevent overlap */
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(sibling, &bridge_to_fix->parent->children,
|
||||
node) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the silbling has a higher secondary bus number
|
||||
* If the sibling has a higher secondary bus number
|
||||
* and it's secondary is equal or smaller than our
|
||||
* current upper limit, set the new upper limit to
|
||||
* the bus number below the silbling's range:
|
||||
* the bus number below the sibling's range:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (silbling->busn_res.start > bridge_to_fix->busn_res.end
|
||||
&& silbling->busn_res.start <= upper_limit)
|
||||
upper_limit = silbling->busn_res.start - 1;
|
||||
if (sibling->busn_res.start > bridge_to_fix->busn_res.end
|
||||
&& sibling->busn_res.start <= upper_limit)
|
||||
upper_limit = sibling->busn_res.start - 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Show that the wanted subordinate number is not possible: */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user