From 52ef6f567e6b9a878a8e0e5d6367aa65a08227a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mateusz Majewski Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 10:56:20 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] thermal/drivers/exynos: Handle devm_regulator_get_optional return value correctly Currently, if regulator is required in the SoC, but devm_regulator_get_optional fails for whatever reason, the execution will proceed without propagating the error. Meanwhile there is no reason to output the error in case of -ENODEV. Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Signed-off-by: Mateusz Majewski Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231201095625.301884-5-m.majewski2@samsung.com --- drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c index c144592d4584..8bcad8a70dc5 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c @@ -1002,9 +1002,17 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return ret; } } else { - if (PTR_ERR(data->regulator) == -EPROBE_DEFER) + ret = PTR_ERR(data->regulator); + switch (ret) { + case -ENODEV: + break; + case -EPROBE_DEFER: return -EPROBE_DEFER; - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Regulator node (vtmu) not found\n"); + default: + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get regulator: %d\n", + ret); + return ret; + } } ret = exynos_map_dt_data(pdev);