mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-25 21:51:40 +00:00
mm/swapfile.c: delete the "last_in_cluster < scan_base" loop in the body of scan_swap_map()
Via commit ebc2a1a691
("swap: make cluster allocation per-cpu"), we
can find that all SWP_SOLIDSTATE "seek is cheap"(SSD case) has already
gone to si->cluster_info scan_swap_map_try_ssd_cluster() route. So that
the "last_in_cluster < scan_base" loop in the body of scan_swap_map()
has already become a dead code snippet, and it should have been deleted.
This patch is to delete the redundant loop as Hugh and Shaohua
suggested.
[hughd@google.com: fix comment, simplify code]
Signed-off-by: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
100873d7a7
commit
50088c4409
@ -523,13 +523,10 @@ static unsigned long scan_swap_map(struct swap_info_struct *si,
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If seek is expensive, start searching for new cluster from
|
||||
* start of partition, to minimize the span of allocated swap.
|
||||
* But if seek is cheap, search from our current position, so
|
||||
* that swap is allocated from all over the partition: if the
|
||||
* Flash Translation Layer only remaps within limited zones,
|
||||
* we don't want to wear out the first zone too quickly.
|
||||
* If seek is cheap, that is the SWP_SOLIDSTATE si->cluster_info
|
||||
* case, just handled by scan_swap_map_try_ssd_cluster() above.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!(si->flags & SWP_SOLIDSTATE))
|
||||
scan_base = offset = si->lowest_bit;
|
||||
scan_base = offset = si->lowest_bit;
|
||||
last_in_cluster = offset + SWAPFILE_CLUSTER - 1;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Locate the first empty (unaligned) cluster */
|
||||
@ -549,26 +546,6 @@ static unsigned long scan_swap_map(struct swap_info_struct *si,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
offset = si->lowest_bit;
|
||||
last_in_cluster = offset + SWAPFILE_CLUSTER - 1;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Locate the first empty (unaligned) cluster */
|
||||
for (; last_in_cluster < scan_base; offset++) {
|
||||
if (si->swap_map[offset])
|
||||
last_in_cluster = offset + SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
|
||||
else if (offset == last_in_cluster) {
|
||||
spin_lock(&si->lock);
|
||||
offset -= SWAPFILE_CLUSTER - 1;
|
||||
si->cluster_next = offset;
|
||||
si->cluster_nr = SWAPFILE_CLUSTER - 1;
|
||||
goto checks;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (unlikely(--latency_ration < 0)) {
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
latency_ration = LATENCY_LIMIT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
offset = scan_base;
|
||||
spin_lock(&si->lock);
|
||||
si->cluster_nr = SWAPFILE_CLUSTER - 1;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user