mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-22 04:02:20 +00:00
socket: Print pf->create() when it does not clear sock->sk on failure.
I suggested to put DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE() in __sock_create() to catch possible use-after-free. But the warning itself was not useful because our interest is in the callee than the caller. Let's define DEBUG_NET_WARN_ONCE() and print the name of pf->create() and the socket identifier. While at it, we enclose DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE() in parentheses too to avoid a checkpatch error. Note that %pf or %pF were obsoleted and will be removed later as per comment in lib/vsprintf.c. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/202410231427.633734b3-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241024201458.49412-1-kuniyu@amazon.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f75d1fbe78
commit
4bbd360a50
@ -149,9 +149,11 @@ do { \
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_NET)
|
||||
#define DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(cond) (void)WARN_ON_ONCE(cond)
|
||||
#define DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(cond) ((void)WARN_ON_ONCE(cond))
|
||||
#define DEBUG_NET_WARN_ONCE(cond, format...) ((void)WARN_ONCE(cond, format))
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(cond) BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(cond)
|
||||
#define DEBUG_NET_WARN_ONCE(cond, format...) BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID(cond)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* _LINUX_NET_DEBUG_H */
|
||||
|
@ -1578,7 +1578,9 @@ int __sock_create(struct net *net, int family, int type, int protocol,
|
||||
/* ->create should release the allocated sock->sk object on error
|
||||
* and make sure sock->sk is set to NULL to avoid use-after-free
|
||||
*/
|
||||
DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(sock->sk);
|
||||
DEBUG_NET_WARN_ONCE(sock->sk,
|
||||
"%ps must clear sock->sk on failure, family: %d, type: %d, protocol: %d\n",
|
||||
pf->create, family, type, protocol);
|
||||
goto out_module_put;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user