mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-05 19:41:54 +00:00
drm/edid: Retry EDID fetch up to four times
This matches the X server's retry logic. Note that we'll only retry if we get a DDC response but fail validation; legitimately disconnected outputs will bomb out early. See also: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/532957 Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f985dedb57
commit
47ee4ccf74
@ -133,9 +133,6 @@ static bool edid_is_valid(struct edid *edid)
|
||||
DRM_ERROR("EDID has major version %d, instead of 1\n", edid->version);
|
||||
goto bad;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (edid->revision > 4)
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG("EDID minor > 4, assuming backward compatibility\n");
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < EDID_LENGTH; i++)
|
||||
csum += raw_edid[i];
|
||||
if (csum) {
|
||||
@ -143,6 +140,9 @@ static bool edid_is_valid(struct edid *edid)
|
||||
goto bad;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (edid->revision > 4)
|
||||
DRM_DEBUG("EDID minor > 4, assuming backward compatibility\n");
|
||||
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
||||
bad:
|
||||
@ -1060,19 +1060,19 @@ static int drm_ddc_read_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
|
||||
struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
|
||||
char *buf, int len)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = drm_do_probe_ddc_edid(adapter, buf, len);
|
||||
if (ret != 0) {
|
||||
goto end;
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
|
||||
if (drm_do_probe_ddc_edid(adapter, buf, len))
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
if (edid_is_valid((struct edid *)buf))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!edid_is_valid((struct edid *)buf)) {
|
||||
dev_warn(&connector->dev->pdev->dev, "%s: EDID invalid.\n",
|
||||
drm_get_connector_name(connector));
|
||||
ret = -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
end:
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/* repeated checksum failures; warn, but carry on */
|
||||
dev_warn(&connector->dev->pdev->dev, "%s: EDID invalid.\n",
|
||||
drm_get_connector_name(connector));
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user