mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-21 19:41:42 +00:00
macsec: Enable devices to advertise whether they update sk_buff md_dst during offloads
Cannot know whether a Rx skb missing md_dst is intended for MACsec or not
without knowing whether the device is able to update this field during an
offload. Assume that an offload to a MACsec device cannot support updating
md_dst by default. Capable devices can advertise that they do indicate that
an skb is related to a MACsec offloaded packet using the md_dst.
Cc: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 860ead89b8
("net/macsec: Add MACsec skb_metadata_dst Rx Data path support")
Signed-off-by: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240423181319.115860-2-rrameshbabu@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4dcd0e83ea
commit
475747a193
@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ struct macsec_context {
|
|||||||
* for the TX tag
|
* for the TX tag
|
||||||
* @needed_tailroom: number of bytes reserved at the end of the sk_buff for the
|
* @needed_tailroom: number of bytes reserved at the end of the sk_buff for the
|
||||||
* TX tag
|
* TX tag
|
||||||
|
* @rx_uses_md_dst: whether MACsec device offload supports sk_buff md_dst
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
struct macsec_ops {
|
struct macsec_ops {
|
||||||
/* Device wide */
|
/* Device wide */
|
||||||
@ -352,6 +353,7 @@ struct macsec_ops {
|
|||||||
struct sk_buff *skb);
|
struct sk_buff *skb);
|
||||||
unsigned int needed_headroom;
|
unsigned int needed_headroom;
|
||||||
unsigned int needed_tailroom;
|
unsigned int needed_tailroom;
|
||||||
|
bool rx_uses_md_dst;
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
void macsec_pn_wrapped(struct macsec_secy *secy, struct macsec_tx_sa *tx_sa);
|
void macsec_pn_wrapped(struct macsec_secy *secy, struct macsec_tx_sa *tx_sa);
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user