mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-24 21:21:41 +00:00
open: return EINVAL for O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT
After a couple of years and multiple LTS releases we received a report that the behavior of O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT changed starting with v5.7. On kernels prior to v5.7 combinations of O_DIRECTORY, O_CREAT, O_EXCL had the following semantics: (1) open("/tmp/d", O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT) * d doesn't exist: create regular file * d exists and is a regular file: ENOTDIR * d exists and is a directory: EISDIR (2) open("/tmp/d", O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT | O_EXCL) * d doesn't exist: create regular file * d exists and is a regular file: EEXIST * d exists and is a directory: EEXIST (3) open("/tmp/d", O_DIRECTORY | O_EXCL) * d doesn't exist: ENOENT * d exists and is a regular file: ENOTDIR * d exists and is a directory: open directory On kernels since to v5.7 combinations of O_DIRECTORY, O_CREAT, O_EXCL have the following semantics: (1) open("/tmp/d", O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT) * d doesn't exist: ENOTDIR (create regular file) * d exists and is a regular file: ENOTDIR * d exists and is a directory: EISDIR (2) open("/tmp/d", O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT | O_EXCL) * d doesn't exist: ENOTDIR (create regular file) * d exists and is a regular file: EEXIST * d exists and is a directory: EEXIST (3) open("/tmp/d", O_DIRECTORY | O_EXCL) * d doesn't exist: ENOENT * d exists and is a regular file: ENOTDIR * d exists and is a directory: open directory This is a fairly substantial semantic change that userspace didn't notice until Pedro took the time to deliberately figure out corner cases. Since no one noticed this breakage we can somewhat safely assume that O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT combinations are likely unused. The v5.7 breakage is especially weird because while ENOTDIR is returned indicating failure a regular file is actually created. This doesn't make a lot of sense. Time was spent finding potential users of this combination. Searching on codesearch.debian.net showed that codebases often express semantical expectations about O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT which are completely contrary to what our code has done and currently does. The expectation often is that this particular combination would create and open a directory. This suggests users who tried to use that combination would stumble upon the counterintuitive behavior no matter if pre-v5.7 or post v5.7 and quickly realize neither semantics give them what they want. For some examples see the code examples in [1] to [3] and the discussion in [4]. There are various ways to address this issue. The lazy/simple option would be to restore the pre-v5.7 behavior and to just live with that bug forever. But since there's a real chance that the O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT quirk isn't relied upon we should try to get away with murder(ing bad semantics) first. If we need to Frankenstein pre-v5.7 behavior later so be it. So let's simply return EINVAL categorically for O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT combinations. In addition to cleaning up the old bug this also opens up the possiblity to make that flag combination do something more intuitive in the future. Starting with this commit the following semantics apply: (1) open("/tmp/d", O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT) * d doesn't exist: EINVAL * d exists and is a regular file: EINVAL * d exists and is a directory: EINVAL (2) open("/tmp/d", O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT | O_EXCL) * d doesn't exist: EINVAL * d exists and is a regular file: EINVAL * d exists and is a directory: EINVAL (3) open("/tmp/d", O_DIRECTORY | O_EXCL) * d doesn't exist: ENOENT * d exists and is a regular file: ENOTDIR * d exists and is a directory: open directory One additional note, O_TMPFILE is implemented as: #define __O_TMPFILE 020000000 #define O_TMPFILE (__O_TMPFILE | O_DIRECTORY) #define O_TMPFILE_MASK (__O_TMPFILE | O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT) For older kernels it was important to return an explicit error when O_TMPFILE wasn't supported. So O_TMPFILE requires that O_DIRECTORY is raised alongside __O_TMPFILE. It also enforced that O_CREAT wasn't specified. Since O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT could be used to create a regular allowing that combination together with __O_TMPFILE would've meant that false positives were possible, i.e., that a regular file was created instead of a O_TMPFILE. This could've been used to trick userspace into thinking it operated on a O_TMPFILE when it wasn't. Now that we block O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT completely the check for O_CREAT in the __O_TMPFILE branch via if ((flags & O_TMPFILE_MASK) != O_TMPFILE) can be dropped. Instead we can simply check verify that O_DIRECTORY is raised via if (!(flags & O_DIRECTORY)) and explain this in two comments. As Aleksa pointed out O_PATH is unaffected by this change since it always returned EINVAL if O_CREAT was specified - with or without O_DIRECTORY. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230320071442.172228-1-pedro.falcato@gmail.com Link: https://sources.debian.org/src/flatpak/1.14.4-1/subprojects/libglnx/glnx-dirfd.c/?hl=324#L324 [1] Link: https://sources.debian.org/src/flatpak-builder/1.2.3-1/subprojects/libglnx/glnx-shutil.c/?hl=251#L251 [2] Link: https://sources.debian.org/src/ostree/2022.7-2/libglnx/glnx-dirfd.c/?hl=324#L324 [3] Link: https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/11/26/14 [4] Reported-by: Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@gmail.com> Cc: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e8d018dd02
commit
43b4506326
18
fs/open.c
18
fs/open.c
@ -1196,13 +1196,21 @@ inline int build_open_flags(const struct open_how *how, struct open_flags *op)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* In order to ensure programs get explicit errors when trying to use
|
||||
* O_TMPFILE on old kernels, O_TMPFILE is implemented such that it
|
||||
* looks like (O_DIRECTORY|O_RDWR & ~O_CREAT) to old kernels. But we
|
||||
* have to require userspace to explicitly set it.
|
||||
* Block bugs where O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT created regular files.
|
||||
* Note, that blocking O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT here also protects
|
||||
* O_TMPFILE below which requires O_DIRECTORY being raised.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((flags & (O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT)) == (O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Now handle the creative implementation of O_TMPFILE. */
|
||||
if (flags & __O_TMPFILE) {
|
||||
if ((flags & O_TMPFILE_MASK) != O_TMPFILE)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* In order to ensure programs get explicit errors when trying
|
||||
* to use O_TMPFILE on old kernels we enforce that O_DIRECTORY
|
||||
* is raised alongside __O_TMPFILE.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!(flags & O_DIRECTORY))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
if (!(acc_mode & MAY_WRITE))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
@ -91,7 +91,6 @@
|
||||
|
||||
/* a horrid kludge trying to make sure that this will fail on old kernels */
|
||||
#define O_TMPFILE (__O_TMPFILE | O_DIRECTORY)
|
||||
#define O_TMPFILE_MASK (__O_TMPFILE | O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT)
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef O_NDELAY
|
||||
#define O_NDELAY O_NONBLOCK
|
||||
|
@ -91,7 +91,6 @@
|
||||
|
||||
/* a horrid kludge trying to make sure that this will fail on old kernels */
|
||||
#define O_TMPFILE (__O_TMPFILE | O_DIRECTORY)
|
||||
#define O_TMPFILE_MASK (__O_TMPFILE | O_DIRECTORY | O_CREAT)
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef O_NDELAY
|
||||
#define O_NDELAY O_NONBLOCK
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user