mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-24 21:21:41 +00:00
kernfs: RCU protect kernfs_nodes and avoid kernfs_idr_lock in kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id()
The BPF helper bpf_cgroup_from_id() calls kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id() which acquires kernfs_idr_lock, which is an non-raw non-IRQ-safe lock. This can lead to deadlocks as bpf_cgroup_from_id() can be called from any BPF programs including e.g. the ones that attach to functions which are holding the scheduler rq lock. Consider the following BPF program: SEC("fentry/__set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked") int BPF_PROG(__set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked, struct task_struct *p, struct affinity_context *affn_ctx, struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf) { struct cgroup *cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(p->cgroups->dfl_cgrp->kn->id); if (cgrp) { bpf_printk("%d[%s] in %s", p->pid, p->comm, cgrp->kn->name); bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp); } return 0; } __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked() is called with rq lock held and the above BPF program calls bpf_cgroup_from_id() within leading to the following lockdep warning: ===================================================== WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected 6.7.0-rc3-work-00053-g07124366a1d7-dirty #147 Not tainted ----------------------------------------------------- repro/1620 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire: ffffffff833b3688 (kernfs_idr_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id+0x1e/0x70 and this task is already holding: ffff888237ced698 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: task_rq_lock+0x4e/0xf0 which would create a new lock dependency: (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2} -> (kernfs_idr_lock){+.+.}-{2:2} ... Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(kernfs_idr_lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&rq->__lock); lock(kernfs_idr_lock); <Interrupt> lock(&rq->__lock); *** DEADLOCK *** ... Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70 dump_stack+0x10/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x781/0x2a40 lock_acquire+0xbf/0x1f0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id+0x1e/0x70 cgroup_get_from_id+0x21/0x240 bpf_cgroup_from_id+0xe/0x20 bpf_prog_98652316e9337a5a___set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked+0x96/0x11a bpf_trampoline_6442545632+0x4f/0x1000 __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked+0x5/0x5a0 sched_setaffinity+0x1b3/0x290 __x64_sys_sched_setaffinity+0x4f/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e Let's fix it by protecting kernfs_node and kernfs_root with RCU and making kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id() acquire rcu_read_lock() instead of kernfs_idr_lock. This adds an rcu_head to kernfs_node making it larger by 16 bytes on 64bit. Combined with the preceding rearrange patch, the net increase is 8 bytes. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240109214828.252092-4-tj@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1c9f2c7606
commit
4207b556e6
@ -529,6 +529,20 @@ void kernfs_get(struct kernfs_node *kn)
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kernfs_get);
|
||||
|
||||
static void kernfs_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct kernfs_node *kn = container_of(rcu, struct kernfs_node, rcu);
|
||||
|
||||
kfree_const(kn->name);
|
||||
|
||||
if (kn->iattr) {
|
||||
simple_xattrs_free(&kn->iattr->xattrs, NULL);
|
||||
kmem_cache_free(kernfs_iattrs_cache, kn->iattr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
kmem_cache_free(kernfs_node_cache, kn);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* kernfs_put - put a reference count on a kernfs_node
|
||||
* @kn: the target kernfs_node
|
||||
@ -557,16 +571,11 @@ void kernfs_put(struct kernfs_node *kn)
|
||||
if (kernfs_type(kn) == KERNFS_LINK)
|
||||
kernfs_put(kn->symlink.target_kn);
|
||||
|
||||
kfree_const(kn->name);
|
||||
|
||||
if (kn->iattr) {
|
||||
simple_xattrs_free(&kn->iattr->xattrs, NULL);
|
||||
kmem_cache_free(kernfs_iattrs_cache, kn->iattr);
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_lock(&kernfs_idr_lock);
|
||||
idr_remove(&root->ino_idr, (u32)kernfs_ino(kn));
|
||||
spin_unlock(&kernfs_idr_lock);
|
||||
kmem_cache_free(kernfs_node_cache, kn);
|
||||
|
||||
call_rcu(&kn->rcu, kernfs_free_rcu);
|
||||
|
||||
kn = parent;
|
||||
if (kn) {
|
||||
@ -575,7 +584,7 @@ void kernfs_put(struct kernfs_node *kn)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* just released the root kn, free @root too */
|
||||
idr_destroy(&root->ino_idr);
|
||||
kfree(root);
|
||||
kfree_rcu(root, rcu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kernfs_put);
|
||||
@ -715,7 +724,7 @@ struct kernfs_node *kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id(struct kernfs_root *root,
|
||||
ino_t ino = kernfs_id_ino(id);
|
||||
u32 gen = kernfs_id_gen(id);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&kernfs_idr_lock);
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
|
||||
kn = idr_find(&root->ino_idr, (u32)ino);
|
||||
if (!kn)
|
||||
@ -739,10 +748,10 @@ struct kernfs_node *kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id(struct kernfs_root *root,
|
||||
if (unlikely(!__kernfs_active(kn) || !atomic_inc_not_zero(&kn->count)))
|
||||
goto err_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock(&kernfs_idr_lock);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
return kn;
|
||||
err_unlock:
|
||||
spin_unlock(&kernfs_idr_lock);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ struct kernfs_root {
|
||||
struct rw_semaphore kernfs_rwsem;
|
||||
struct rw_semaphore kernfs_iattr_rwsem;
|
||||
struct rw_semaphore kernfs_supers_rwsem;
|
||||
|
||||
struct rcu_head rcu;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/* +1 to avoid triggering overflow warning when negating it */
|
||||
|
@ -223,6 +223,8 @@ struct kernfs_node {
|
||||
|
||||
void *priv;
|
||||
struct kernfs_iattrs *iattr;
|
||||
|
||||
struct rcu_head rcu;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user