mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-04 01:51:34 +00:00
selftests/seccomp: Add test for unknown SECCOMP_RET kill behavior
While we were testing for the behavior of unknown seccomp filter return values, there was no test for how it acted in a thread group. Add a test in the thread group tests for this. Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4d671d922d
commit
3932fcecd9
@ -774,8 +774,15 @@ void *kill_thread(void *data)
|
||||
return (void *)SIBLING_EXIT_UNKILLED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
enum kill_t {
|
||||
KILL_THREAD,
|
||||
KILL_PROCESS,
|
||||
RET_UNKNOWN
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/* Prepare a thread that will kill itself or both of us. */
|
||||
void kill_thread_or_group(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, bool kill_process)
|
||||
void kill_thread_or_group(struct __test_metadata *_metadata,
|
||||
enum kill_t kill_how)
|
||||
{
|
||||
pthread_t thread;
|
||||
void *status;
|
||||
@ -791,11 +798,12 @@ void kill_thread_or_group(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, bool kill_process)
|
||||
.len = (unsigned short)ARRAY_SIZE(filter_thread),
|
||||
.filter = filter_thread,
|
||||
};
|
||||
int kill = kill_how == KILL_PROCESS ? SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS : 0xAAAAAAAAA;
|
||||
struct sock_filter filter_process[] = {
|
||||
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS,
|
||||
offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)),
|
||||
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_prctl, 0, 1),
|
||||
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS),
|
||||
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, kill),
|
||||
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW),
|
||||
};
|
||||
struct sock_fprog prog_process = {
|
||||
@ -808,13 +816,15 @@ void kill_thread_or_group(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, bool kill_process)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(0, seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, 0,
|
||||
kill_process ? &prog_process : &prog_thread));
|
||||
kill_how == KILL_THREAD ? &prog_thread
|
||||
: &prog_process));
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Add the KILL_THREAD rule again to make sure that the KILL_PROCESS
|
||||
* flag cannot be downgraded by a new filter.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(0, seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, 0, &prog_thread));
|
||||
if (kill_how == KILL_PROCESS)
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(0, seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, 0, &prog_thread));
|
||||
|
||||
/* Start a thread that will exit immediately. */
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&thread, NULL, kill_thread, (void *)false));
|
||||
@ -842,7 +852,7 @@ TEST(KILL_thread)
|
||||
child_pid = fork();
|
||||
ASSERT_LE(0, child_pid);
|
||||
if (child_pid == 0) {
|
||||
kill_thread_or_group(_metadata, false);
|
||||
kill_thread_or_group(_metadata, KILL_THREAD);
|
||||
_exit(38);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -861,7 +871,7 @@ TEST(KILL_process)
|
||||
child_pid = fork();
|
||||
ASSERT_LE(0, child_pid);
|
||||
if (child_pid == 0) {
|
||||
kill_thread_or_group(_metadata, true);
|
||||
kill_thread_or_group(_metadata, KILL_PROCESS);
|
||||
_exit(38);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -872,6 +882,27 @@ TEST(KILL_process)
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(SIGSYS, WTERMSIG(status));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(KILL_unknown)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int status;
|
||||
pid_t child_pid;
|
||||
|
||||
child_pid = fork();
|
||||
ASSERT_LE(0, child_pid);
|
||||
if (child_pid == 0) {
|
||||
kill_thread_or_group(_metadata, RET_UNKNOWN);
|
||||
_exit(38);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(child_pid, waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0));
|
||||
|
||||
/* If the entire process was killed, we'll see SIGSYS. */
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(WIFSIGNALED(status)) {
|
||||
TH_LOG("Unknown SECCOMP_RET is only killing the thread?");
|
||||
}
|
||||
ASSERT_EQ(SIGSYS, WTERMSIG(status));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* TODO(wad) add 64-bit versus 32-bit arg tests. */
|
||||
TEST(arg_out_of_range)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user