mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-23 04:31:50 +00:00
lockdep: Correct lock_classes index mapping
A kernel exception was hit when trying to dump /proc/lockdep_chains after lockdep report "BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low!": Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00054005450e05c3 ... 00054005450e05c3] address between user and kernel address ranges ... pc : [0xffffffece769b3a8] string+0x50/0x10c lr : [0xffffffece769ac88] vsnprintf+0x468/0x69c ... Call trace: string+0x50/0x10c vsnprintf+0x468/0x69c seq_printf+0x8c/0xd8 print_name+0x64/0xf4 lc_show+0xb8/0x128 seq_read_iter+0x3cc/0x5fc proc_reg_read_iter+0xdc/0x1d4 The cause of the problem is the function lock_chain_get_class() will shift lock_classes index by 1, but the index don't need to be shifted anymore since commit01bb6f0af9
("locking/lockdep: Change the range of class_idx in held_lock struct") already change the index to start from 0. The lock_classes[-1] located at chain_hlocks array. When printing lock_classes[-1] after the chain_hlocks entries are modified, the exception happened. The output of lockdep_chains are incorrect due to this problem too. Fixes:f611e8cf98
("lockdep: Take read/write status in consideration when generate chainkey") Signed-off-by: Cheng Jui Wang <cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220210105011.21712-1-cheng-jui.wang@mediatek.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
dfd42facf1
commit
28df029d53
@ -3462,7 +3462,7 @@ struct lock_class *lock_chain_get_class(struct lock_chain *chain, int i)
|
||||
u16 chain_hlock = chain_hlocks[chain->base + i];
|
||||
unsigned int class_idx = chain_hlock_class_idx(chain_hlock);
|
||||
|
||||
return lock_classes + class_idx - 1;
|
||||
return lock_classes + class_idx;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -3530,7 +3530,7 @@ static void print_chain_keys_chain(struct lock_chain *chain)
|
||||
hlock_id = chain_hlocks[chain->base + i];
|
||||
chain_key = print_chain_key_iteration(hlock_id, chain_key);
|
||||
|
||||
print_lock_name(lock_classes + chain_hlock_class_idx(hlock_id) - 1);
|
||||
print_lock_name(lock_classes + chain_hlock_class_idx(hlock_id));
|
||||
printk("\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user