ACPI / thermal: _TMP and _CRT/_HOT/_PSV/_ACx dependency fix

On some platforms, _TMP and _CRT/_HOT/_PSV/_ACx have dependency.
And there is no way for OS to detect this dependency.

commit 9bcb811896 shows us a problem
that _TMP must be evaluate after _CRT/_HOT/_PSV/_ACx, or else
firmware will shutdown the system.

But the machine in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43284
shows us that _PSV would return valid value only if _TMP has been
evaluated once.

With this patch, all of the control methods will be evaluated once,
in the _CRT/_HOT/_PSV/_CRT/_TMP order, before they are actually used.

[rjw: Added a local variable for the handle and modified the loop
 slightly.]
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: katabami <katabami@lavabit.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Zhang Rui 2012-11-27 20:42:11 +01:00 committed by Rafael J. Wysocki
parent 05bce79e6d
commit 261cba2deb

View File

@ -984,6 +984,38 @@ static void acpi_thermal_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
}
}
/*
* On some platforms, the AML code has dependency about
* the evaluating order of _TMP and _CRT/_HOT/_PSV/_ACx.
* 1. On HP Pavilion G4-1016tx, _TMP must be invoked after
* /_CRT/_HOT/_PSV/_ACx, or else system will be power off.
* 2. On HP Compaq 6715b/6715s, the return value of _PSV is 0
* if _TMP has never been evaluated.
*
* As this dependency is totally transparent to OS, evaluate
* all of them once, in the order of _CRT/_HOT/_PSV/_ACx,
* _TMP, before they are actually used.
*/
static void acpi_thermal_aml_dependency_fix(struct acpi_thermal *tz)
{
acpi_handle handle = tz->device->handle;
unsigned long long value;
int i;
acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_CRT", NULL, &value);
acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_HOT", NULL, &value);
acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_PSV", NULL, &value);
for (i = 0; i < ACPI_THERMAL_MAX_ACTIVE; i++) {
char name[5] = { '_', 'A', 'C', ('0' + i), '\0' };
acpi_status status;
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, name, NULL, &value);
if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
break;
}
acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_TMP", NULL, &value);
}
static int acpi_thermal_get_info(struct acpi_thermal *tz)
{
int result = 0;
@ -992,6 +1024,8 @@ static int acpi_thermal_get_info(struct acpi_thermal *tz)
if (!tz)
return -EINVAL;
acpi_thermal_aml_dependency_fix(tz);
/* Get trip points [_CRT, _PSV, etc.] (required) */
result = acpi_thermal_get_trip_points(tz);
if (result)